Add to ORKGOn June 28, 2005, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued an important opinion on the extraterritorial reach of the US antitrust laws in Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-Laroche, Ltd. The court held, on remand from the Supreme Court, that plaintiffs injured outside US commerce cannot bring antitrust suits in US courts unless the US effects of the anticompetitive conduct at issue are the proximate cause of their injuries. The decision construes narrowly the circumstances under which plaintiffs may be able to sue in US courts for injuries suffered in foreign commerce
What role does the United States play in policing international commerce? At what point do the laws ...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
Decades of cooperation between international antitrust authorities are now under threat following tw...
Efforts by private plaintiffs to enforce the U.S. antitrust laws extraterritorially have become an e...
In many ways, the Supreme Court\u27s opinion of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. raised mor...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
Before it was uncovered and prosecuted, the international vitamin cartel, known as Vitamins, Inc. ...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
This term, the Supreme Court is set to address an issue of profound importance to the regulation of ...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
The instant decision is an evolutionary step in the development of extraterritorial antitrust but it...
What role does the United States play in policing international commerce? At what point do the laws ...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
Decades of cooperation between international antitrust authorities are now under threat following tw...
Efforts by private plaintiffs to enforce the U.S. antitrust laws extraterritorially have become an e...
In many ways, the Supreme Court\u27s opinion of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. raised mor...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
Before it was uncovered and prosecuted, the international vitamin cartel, known as Vitamins, Inc. ...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
This term, the Supreme Court is set to address an issue of profound importance to the regulation of ...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
The instant decision is an evolutionary step in the development of extraterritorial antitrust but it...
What role does the United States play in policing international commerce? At what point do the laws ...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
Decades of cooperation between international antitrust authorities are now under threat following tw...