Decades of cooperation between international antitrust authorities are now under threat following two controversial rulings by the US courts of appeal in New York and Washington D.C. William Kolasky examines the far-reaching implications of the Empagran and Kruman case
The trend towards convergence of substantive antitrust doctrine means that most jurisdictions now co...
In the fractious realm of antitrust law, one proposition commands nearly universal allegiance—that a...
ABSTRACT: The US Supreme Court was instrumental in developing a consistent body of case law on expor...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
Antitrust is an important area of law and policy for most companies in the world. Having divergent r...
United States antitrust laws increasingly have affected the international activities of U.S. corpora...
It is the focus of this thesis to critically evaluate the cooperative enforcement option proffered b...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
We have experienced nothing short of an explosion in competition law enactment and enforcement over ...
IN THIS ERA of relative peace, many nations, including our own, are focusing more attention on impor...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper analyzes international antitrust enforcement when multinational firms operate in several ...
This paper argues that the facts in the vitamins cartel support decisions in the 2nd and DC circuits...
The trend towards convergence of substantive antitrust doctrine means that most jurisdictions now co...
In the fractious realm of antitrust law, one proposition commands nearly universal allegiance—that a...
ABSTRACT: The US Supreme Court was instrumental in developing a consistent body of case law on expor...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
Antitrust is an important area of law and policy for most companies in the world. Having divergent r...
United States antitrust laws increasingly have affected the international activities of U.S. corpora...
It is the focus of this thesis to critically evaluate the cooperative enforcement option proffered b...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
We have experienced nothing short of an explosion in competition law enactment and enforcement over ...
IN THIS ERA of relative peace, many nations, including our own, are focusing more attention on impor...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper analyzes international antitrust enforcement when multinational firms operate in several ...
This paper argues that the facts in the vitamins cartel support decisions in the 2nd and DC circuits...
The trend towards convergence of substantive antitrust doctrine means that most jurisdictions now co...
In the fractious realm of antitrust law, one proposition commands nearly universal allegiance—that a...
ABSTRACT: The US Supreme Court was instrumental in developing a consistent body of case law on expor...