Add to ORKGMay the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from other foreign companies, pursue Sherman Act claims seeking recovery for overcharges paid in transactions occurring entirely outside U.S. commerce under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (FTAIA), 15 U.S.C. § 6a? Do such foreign plaintiffs lack standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15(a)
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
The Third Circuit recently held that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (FTAIA) creates a s...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
On June 28, 2005, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued an important opinion o...
This term, the Supreme Court is set to address an issue of profound importance to the regulation of ...
In many ways, the Supreme Court\u27s opinion of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. raised mor...
In F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., the Supreme Court interpreted the Foreign Trade Antit...
This comment will outline the international response to extraterritorial application of United State...
Efforts by private plaintiffs to enforce the U.S. antitrust laws extraterritorially have become an e...
Historically, the United States has sought to impose its moralistic values extraterritorially. Our ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that foreign nations are entitled to sue for treble ...
The Ninth Circuit may soon consider whether challenges to antitrust activity that occurs abroad must...
This paper argues that the facts in the vitamins cartel support decisions in the 2nd and DC circuits...
What role does the United States play in policing international commerce? At what point do the laws ...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
The Third Circuit recently held that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (FTAIA) creates a s...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
On June 28, 2005, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued an important opinion o...
This term, the Supreme Court is set to address an issue of profound importance to the regulation of ...
In many ways, the Supreme Court\u27s opinion of F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. raised mor...
In F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., the Supreme Court interpreted the Foreign Trade Antit...
This comment will outline the international response to extraterritorial application of United State...
Efforts by private plaintiffs to enforce the U.S. antitrust laws extraterritorially have become an e...
Historically, the United States has sought to impose its moralistic values extraterritorially. Our ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that foreign nations are entitled to sue for treble ...
The Ninth Circuit may soon consider whether challenges to antitrust activity that occurs abroad must...
This paper argues that the facts in the vitamins cartel support decisions in the 2nd and DC circuits...
What role does the United States play in policing international commerce? At what point do the laws ...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
The Third Circuit recently held that the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (FTAIA) creates a s...
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust...