Add to ORKGProfessors Field, Nard, and Duffy submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case of Dickinson v. Zurko. In Dickinson, the Federal Circuit concluded that the Patent and Trademark Office\u27s factual findings must be reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard and not the substantial evidence standard set out in the Administrative Procedure Act. However, the amicus brief asserted that the PTO is subject to the standards of judicial review set forth in the APA
Assistant Professor Steven R. Morrison has filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of North Dak...
Last year the U.S. Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit both reacted against the growing use of fr...
The America Invents Act (AIA) represents the most significant change to U.S. patent law since the 19...
Professors Field, Nard, and Duffy submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case of Dick...
Professors Field, Nard, and Duffy (the “Amici”) submitted the below amicus brief to the Court. Their...
This paper addresses the Patent Office\u27s misinterpretation of the Supreme Court\u27s ruling in Di...
Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in 1946 as a comprehensive statute to regula...
To those unfamiliar with the long, often bitter, struggle over equally compelling needs to provide, ...
Amici are scholars at U.S. law schools whose research and teaching focus is intellectual property la...
In re Zurko isolated one of the oldest U.S. agencies from mainstream administrative law because the ...
The principle of judicial deference to agency interpretations of law has been a pillar of this Court...
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO ) is one of the oldest agencies in the Ameri...
The Federal Circuit’s ruling that the § 2(a) disparagement provision is unconstitutional, if upheld,...
Interactions between the PTO and the courts are more complex than for most agencies. PTO decisions m...
The District Court correctly determined that the challenged speech of Dr. Steven Novella was not com...
Assistant Professor Steven R. Morrison has filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of North Dak...
Last year the U.S. Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit both reacted against the growing use of fr...
The America Invents Act (AIA) represents the most significant change to U.S. patent law since the 19...
Professors Field, Nard, and Duffy submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case of Dick...
Professors Field, Nard, and Duffy (the “Amici”) submitted the below amicus brief to the Court. Their...
This paper addresses the Patent Office\u27s misinterpretation of the Supreme Court\u27s ruling in Di...
Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in 1946 as a comprehensive statute to regula...
To those unfamiliar with the long, often bitter, struggle over equally compelling needs to provide, ...
Amici are scholars at U.S. law schools whose research and teaching focus is intellectual property la...
In re Zurko isolated one of the oldest U.S. agencies from mainstream administrative law because the ...
The principle of judicial deference to agency interpretations of law has been a pillar of this Court...
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO ) is one of the oldest agencies in the Ameri...
The Federal Circuit’s ruling that the § 2(a) disparagement provision is unconstitutional, if upheld,...
Interactions between the PTO and the courts are more complex than for most agencies. PTO decisions m...
The District Court correctly determined that the challenged speech of Dr. Steven Novella was not com...
Assistant Professor Steven R. Morrison has filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of North Dak...
Last year the U.S. Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit both reacted against the growing use of fr...
The America Invents Act (AIA) represents the most significant change to U.S. patent law since the 19...