In re Zurko isolated one of the oldest U.S. agencies from mainstream administrative law because the Federal Circuit has chosen to review the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office more as it would a federal district court. The case is important, if only because the Supreme Court rarely treats the PTO as an agency. Also, regardless of whether the issue or the Federal Circuit itself is the primary target, the decision could have a major effect on the type of case most commonly encountered by that court
This Article challenges the Supreme Court\u27s recent holding that administrative law doctrines shou...
This article contends that the Federal Circuit\u27s decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogy...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has long relied on active appellate...
Interactions between the PTO and the courts are more complex than for most agencies. PTO decisions m...
Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in 1946 as a comprehensive statute to regula...
Among patent scholars who address institutional questions, many favor the courts over the PTO as the...
To those unfamiliar with the long, often bitter, struggle over equally compelling needs to provide, ...
Federal courts can ill afford to ignore, assume, or improvise a pervasively important administrative...
My objective in this Article is to demonstrate that the PTO\u27s patentability determinations are qu...
Whereas Congress has increasingly turned to administrative agencies to regulate complex technical ar...
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO ) is one of the oldest agencies in the Ameri...
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of certain adjudications of patent ri...
For more than two decades, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and the Federal Circuit have exerci...
Congress formed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1982 in part to improve uniform...
This paper addresses the Patent Office\u27s misinterpretation of the Supreme Court\u27s ruling in Di...
This Article challenges the Supreme Court\u27s recent holding that administrative law doctrines shou...
This article contends that the Federal Circuit\u27s decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogy...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has long relied on active appellate...
Interactions between the PTO and the courts are more complex than for most agencies. PTO decisions m...
Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in 1946 as a comprehensive statute to regula...
Among patent scholars who address institutional questions, many favor the courts over the PTO as the...
To those unfamiliar with the long, often bitter, struggle over equally compelling needs to provide, ...
Federal courts can ill afford to ignore, assume, or improvise a pervasively important administrative...
My objective in this Article is to demonstrate that the PTO\u27s patentability determinations are qu...
Whereas Congress has increasingly turned to administrative agencies to regulate complex technical ar...
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO ) is one of the oldest agencies in the Ameri...
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of certain adjudications of patent ri...
For more than two decades, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and the Federal Circuit have exerci...
Congress formed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1982 in part to improve uniform...
This paper addresses the Patent Office\u27s misinterpretation of the Supreme Court\u27s ruling in Di...
This Article challenges the Supreme Court\u27s recent holding that administrative law doctrines shou...
This article contends that the Federal Circuit\u27s decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogy...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has long relied on active appellate...