Add to ORKGOn a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting defeat in a years-long fight with the Department of the Interior over the renewal of its operating permit. The Secretary of the Interior believed that the region’s designation as “potential wilderness” under the Point Reyes Wilderness Act, along with public policy considerations, obligated him to decline renewal of the permit. In producing an Environmental Impact Statement regarding the impact of closing the farm, the Secretary procedurally insulated his agency decision from later judicial review in Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Jewell
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency a unanimous Supreme Court held that private landowners...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
On a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting d...
This comment summarizes the saga of Drakes Bay Oyster Company (DBOC), located in Point Reyes Nationa...
In Drakes Bay the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that language within appropria...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
In Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addre...
In 1959, petitioner and his fellow corporate associates purchased a waterfront parcel of land in Rho...
This Note calls for the Virginia Supreme Court to recognize that a city’s right to freely pollute th...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Abstract The closure of Drake's Bay Oyster Farm in Point Reyes National Seashore, California, ignite...
In Native Village of Point Hope v. Jewell, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found tha...
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency a unanimous Supreme Court held that private landowners...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
On a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting d...
This comment summarizes the saga of Drakes Bay Oyster Company (DBOC), located in Point Reyes Nationa...
In Drakes Bay the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that language within appropria...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
In Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addre...
In 1959, petitioner and his fellow corporate associates purchased a waterfront parcel of land in Rho...
This Note calls for the Virginia Supreme Court to recognize that a city’s right to freely pollute th...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Abstract The closure of Drake's Bay Oyster Farm in Point Reyes National Seashore, California, ignite...
In Native Village of Point Hope v. Jewell, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found tha...
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency a unanimous Supreme Court held that private landowners...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...