Add to ORKGA group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the City of Redding, California, appealing decisions to approve the City‟s plan to build a business park on protected wetlands. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held: (1) the Corps‟ decision to issue a dredge and fill permit to the City was not arbitrary and capricious; and (2) the FWS‟ finding of no “adverse modification” did not conflict with its determination that the proposed project would destroy critical habitat of protected vernal pool shrimp and Orcutt grass species
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
Landowners and conservation group brought suit against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over a pr...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
In Resource Investments Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, the United States Court of Ap...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
This action is an appeal of a grant of summary judgment to the United States Fish and Wildlife Servi...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center(“Decker”), the United States Supreme Court consi...
It finally happened. For the first time, a court has held that restrictions imposed under the Endang...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that the Bureau of Reclamation d...
This case involves challenges to the adequacy of the United States Forest Service’s biological asses...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
Landowners and conservation group brought suit against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over a pr...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
In Resource Investments Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, the United States Court of Ap...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
This action is an appeal of a grant of summary judgment to the United States Fish and Wildlife Servi...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center(“Decker”), the United States Supreme Court consi...
It finally happened. For the first time, a court has held that restrictions imposed under the Endang...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined that the Bureau of Reclamation d...
This case involves challenges to the adequacy of the United States Forest Service’s biological asses...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...