The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full environmental impact statement on a proposed natural gas plant near a sacred site. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a district court‟s remand order to a Forest Service administrative panel did not constitute a final decision by a court and therefore the order itself was not subject to appellate review. Furthermore, the Court held that where a gas lease was extended past its original terms and the extension was later rejected because it violated NEPA, the lessee had a right to reclaim the original lease and was not subject to an open bid process
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
In Karuk Tribe v. USFS, the Ninth Circuit overturned its own panel’s prior ruling that the Forest Se...
The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Forest Service and Atlantic Coas...
In response to oil and gas development on the Allegheny National Forest, the U.S. Forest Service iss...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. Forest Serv...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit imposed personal sanctions upon plaintiffs’...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
In Karuk Tribe v. USFS, the Ninth Circuit overturned its own panel’s prior ruling that the Forest Se...
The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Forest Service and Atlantic Coas...
In response to oil and gas development on the Allegheny National Forest, the U.S. Forest Service iss...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. Forest Serv...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted the Standing Rock Si...
In Native Ecosystems Council v. Marten, the Ninth Circuit found that the United States Forest Servic...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit imposed personal sanctions upon plaintiffs’...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...