The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Forest Service and Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a company who planned to construct a natural gas pipeline under a section of the Appalachian National Scenic Trail within the George Washington National Forest. The legal battle sought to clarify whether the United States Forest Service had the authority to grant the pipeline builder a right-of-way across the Appalachian Trail. The Court ruled that the National Park Service holds an easement for administering the Appalachian Trail, but the land over which the trail crosses remains under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service. Therefore, under the Mineral Leasing Act, the Forest Service had the authority to grant Atlantic Coas...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina determined the Nantahala...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. Forest Serv...
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, proposed construction of a natural gas pipeline stretching from West V...
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
Environmental activist and indigenous rights groups have challenged the validity of the Keystone XL ...
In response to oil and gas development on the Allegheny National Forest, the U.S. Forest Service iss...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (“ACP”) was designed as a 600-mile underground, pipeline project transpo...
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (“ACP”) was designed as a 600-mile underground, pipeline project transpo...
This Article addresses developments in Virginia oil and gas law for the period from September 1, 201...
Pipelines are an extremely efficient way to move large amounts of oil and gas across long distances....
A single cross-border pipeline project has been the epicenter of environmental litigation for the la...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina determined the Nantahala...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...
In United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the U.S. Forest Serv...
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, proposed construction of a natural gas pipeline stretching from West V...
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24...
Despite the majority’s “needlessly circuitous” route, as described by concurring Judge Brown, Sierra...
Environmental activist and indigenous rights groups have challenged the validity of the Keystone XL ...
In response to oil and gas development on the Allegheny National Forest, the U.S. Forest Service iss...
The Pit River Tribe of northern California sued the U.S. Forest service for not conducting a full en...
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (“ACP”) was designed as a 600-mile underground, pipeline project transpo...
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (“ACP”) was designed as a 600-mile underground, pipeline project transpo...
This Article addresses developments in Virginia oil and gas law for the period from September 1, 201...
Pipelines are an extremely efficient way to move large amounts of oil and gas across long distances....
A single cross-border pipeline project has been the epicenter of environmental litigation for the la...
In Russell Country Sportsmen v. U.S. Forest Service, the District Court for the District of Montana ...
The United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina determined the Nantahala...
In this case, a federal district court held federal agencies must reinitiate Environmental Species A...