In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center(“Decker”), the United States Supreme Court considered whether the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and its implementing regulations require states and industry to obtain permits for stormwater runoff from ditches and culverts built as part of logging roads. The Court determined that the Rule exempts discharges of “channeled stormwater” from logging roads under the CWA
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided novel issues in two cas...
The EPA’s various iterations of the Silvicultural Rule have succeeded in circumventing the Clean Wat...
In Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles, the U.S. Court of Appeals for t...
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center is a recently decided Supreme Court case that origi...
ABSTRACT On remand from the United States Supreme Court, this case addressed whether pollution excee...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, the Supreme Court upheld the EPA’s interpretati...
The article examines a Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which the court held that a Natio...
Disregarding CWA regulations, WVDEP allowed for a state coal mining company, Fola, to discharge poll...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
On September 3, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court deci...
This case note analyzes Sackett v. U.S. Env’t Prot. Agency, 8 F.4th 1075, 1080 (9th Cir. 2021), a ca...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA ( NRDC v. EPA ), the Natural Resources Defense Council (...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided novel issues in two cas...
The EPA’s various iterations of the Silvicultural Rule have succeeded in circumventing the Clean Wat...
In Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles, the U.S. Court of Appeals for t...
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center is a recently decided Supreme Court case that origi...
ABSTRACT On remand from the United States Supreme Court, this case addressed whether pollution excee...
Trout Unlimited’s effort to overturn the EPA’s Water Transfers Rule was stifled by the Second Circui...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, the Supreme Court upheld the EPA’s interpretati...
The article examines a Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which the court held that a Natio...
Disregarding CWA regulations, WVDEP allowed for a state coal mining company, Fola, to discharge poll...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the court was...
On September 3, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court deci...
This case note analyzes Sackett v. U.S. Env’t Prot. Agency, 8 F.4th 1075, 1080 (9th Cir. 2021), a ca...
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA ( NRDC v. EPA ), the Natural Resources Defense Council (...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
A group of environmentalists brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Uni...
In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided novel issues in two cas...