On a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting defeat in a years-long fight with the Department of the Interior over the renewal of its operating permit. The Secretary of the Interior believed that the region’s designation as “potential wilderness” under the Point Reyes Wilderness Act, along with public policy considerations, obligated him to decline renewal of the permit. In producing an Environmental Impact Statement regarding the impact of closing the farm, the Secretary procedurally insulated his agency decision from later judicial review in Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Jewell
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) promotes considered and participatory decision-making, which c...
Australia\u27s aquaculture industry has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. It has become the fastest...
*For reference – suggested modifications are noted in track changes and editorial comments are noted...
On a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting d...
This comment summarizes the saga of Drakes Bay Oyster Company (DBOC), located in Point Reyes Nationa...
In Drakes Bay the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that language within appropria...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the need to address the complex and int...
In its 1994 decision, Ballard Shipping Co. v. Beach Shellfish, the United States Court of Appeals fo...
In Metcalf v. Daley, a Congressman, various conservation organizations, and a member of the Makah Tr...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) promotes considered and participatory decision-making, which c...
Australia\u27s aquaculture industry has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. It has become the fastest...
*For reference – suggested modifications are noted in track changes and editorial comments are noted...
On a sunny summer day in 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company closed its doors to the public, admitting d...
This comment summarizes the saga of Drakes Bay Oyster Company (DBOC), located in Point Reyes Nationa...
In Drakes Bay the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ruled that language within appropria...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently approved the continuing ...
The United States District Court for the District of Maine recently upheld a groundfish recovery pla...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the need to address the complex and int...
In its 1994 decision, Ballard Shipping Co. v. Beach Shellfish, the United States Court of Appeals fo...
In Metcalf v. Daley, a Congressman, various conservation organizations, and a member of the Makah Tr...
In 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected a challenge to the Nav...
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) promotes considered and participatory decision-making, which c...
Australia\u27s aquaculture industry has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. It has become the fastest...
*For reference – suggested modifications are noted in track changes and editorial comments are noted...