Negotiating parties oftentimes do not reach mutually beneficial agreements. A considerable body of research on negotiation analysis compiled a set of so called common biases in negotiations that systematically affect the cognition and behavior of negotiators and thereby influence agreements. The present work adds an additional effect, the attachment effect. This effect biases decision makers in bilateral multi-issue negotiations and influences their preferences via reference points---negotiators get caught in a kind of negotiation fever
Many negotiations offer a potential for integrative agreements in which the parties can maximize joi...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in ...
Negotiating rationally means ‘making the best decisions to maximize your interests’ (Bazerman & Neal...
Negotiating parties oftentimes do not reach mutually beneficial agreements. A considerable body of r...
Negotiation analysis and game theoretic bargaining models usually assume parties to have exogenous p...
Game theoretic bargaining models usually assume parties to have exogenously given preferences from t...
Negotiations frequently end in conflict after one party rejects a final offer. In a large-scale inte...
Several experimental studies have reported that an otherwise robust regularity-the disparity between...
This dissertation deals with negotiation behavior as a function of the negotiators frame -- their co...
International audienceTwo experiments assess the type and amount of conflict influencing decision di...
Purpose – What is the discipline's current grasp of cognitive biases in negotiation processes? What...
Several experimental studies have reported that an otherwise robust regularity-the disparity between...
AbstractWe challenge the assumption that having multiple alternatives is always better than a single...
This paper presents a discussion of the role of adapting expectations in the bargaining process. Neg...
This dissertation consists of three chapters exploring the role that reference-dependentpreferences ...
Many negotiations offer a potential for integrative agreements in which the parties can maximize joi...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in ...
Negotiating rationally means ‘making the best decisions to maximize your interests’ (Bazerman & Neal...
Negotiating parties oftentimes do not reach mutually beneficial agreements. A considerable body of r...
Negotiation analysis and game theoretic bargaining models usually assume parties to have exogenous p...
Game theoretic bargaining models usually assume parties to have exogenously given preferences from t...
Negotiations frequently end in conflict after one party rejects a final offer. In a large-scale inte...
Several experimental studies have reported that an otherwise robust regularity-the disparity between...
This dissertation deals with negotiation behavior as a function of the negotiators frame -- their co...
International audienceTwo experiments assess the type and amount of conflict influencing decision di...
Purpose – What is the discipline's current grasp of cognitive biases in negotiation processes? What...
Several experimental studies have reported that an otherwise robust regularity-the disparity between...
AbstractWe challenge the assumption that having multiple alternatives is always better than a single...
This paper presents a discussion of the role of adapting expectations in the bargaining process. Neg...
This dissertation consists of three chapters exploring the role that reference-dependentpreferences ...
Many negotiations offer a potential for integrative agreements in which the parties can maximize joi...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in ...
Negotiating rationally means ‘making the best decisions to maximize your interests’ (Bazerman & Neal...