The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the following discussion of the nature of legal reasoning. In the course of the dialogue the author notes similarities and dissimilarities between legal reasoning and philosophical and mathematical reasoning. In the end we are left with a clearer insight into the distinctive features of the adjudicative process
What, in general, is a good reason for decision by a court of law? This is the question of jurisprud...
Many of the current debates in jurisprudence focus on articulating the boundaries of law. In this es...
The conception of a ‘law of nature’ is a human product. It was created to play a role in natural phi...
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the foll...
The debate on the metaphysics of laws of nature is one of the many disputes in the metaphysics of sc...
The status of laws of nature has been the locus of a lively debate in recent philosophy. Most partic...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
Recent articles in the Critical Legal Studies literature claim that results from mathematical logic ...
Over the past 50 years, there has been a great deal of philosophical interest in laws of nature, per...
Over the past 50 years, there has been a great deal of philosophical interest in laws of nature, per...
Analyzing the position of two philosophers whose views are recognizably divergent, W. O. Quine and M...
The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship of philosophy to law: to acquaint the reade...
What is special about legal reasoning? In what way is it distinctive? How does it differ from reason...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are m...
What, in general, is a good reason for decision by a court of law? This is the question of jurisprud...
Many of the current debates in jurisprudence focus on articulating the boundaries of law. In this es...
The conception of a ‘law of nature’ is a human product. It was created to play a role in natural phi...
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the foll...
The debate on the metaphysics of laws of nature is one of the many disputes in the metaphysics of sc...
The status of laws of nature has been the locus of a lively debate in recent philosophy. Most partic...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
Recent articles in the Critical Legal Studies literature claim that results from mathematical logic ...
Over the past 50 years, there has been a great deal of philosophical interest in laws of nature, per...
Over the past 50 years, there has been a great deal of philosophical interest in laws of nature, per...
Analyzing the position of two philosophers whose views are recognizably divergent, W. O. Quine and M...
The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship of philosophy to law: to acquaint the reade...
What is special about legal reasoning? In what way is it distinctive? How does it differ from reason...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are m...
What, in general, is a good reason for decision by a court of law? This is the question of jurisprud...
Many of the current debates in jurisprudence focus on articulating the boundaries of law. In this es...
The conception of a ‘law of nature’ is a human product. It was created to play a role in natural phi...