Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are many approaches to legal argumentation. Each of them provides specific insights into highly complex phenomena. Different disciplines, but also different traditions in disciplines (e.g. analytical and continental traditions in philosophy) find here a rare occasion to meet. The present book contains contributions, both historical and thematic, from leading researchers in several of the most important approaches to legal rationality. One of the main issues is the relation between logic and law: the way logic is actually used in law, but also the way logic can make law explicit. An outstanding group of philosophers, logicians and jurists try to me...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
© 1996 Daniel Ashley Douglas HunterOver the past few decades there has emerged a group of researcher...
The aim of this paper is to describe the standing position of legal argumentation for normative syst...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It sta...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
The relationship between logic and law has been a troublesome one and it has been object of much phi...
This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal pe...
Legal argumentation has become one of the prominent research domains of legal philosophy in the last...
The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century,...
This paper investigates how the logical aspects of legal language determine possibilities to attack ...
The present work will investigate in the most important aspects of the logic of the reasonable, in w...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
© 1996 Daniel Ashley Douglas HunterOver the past few decades there has emerged a group of researcher...
The aim of this paper is to describe the standing position of legal argumentation for normative syst...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It sta...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
The relationship between logic and law has been a troublesome one and it has been object of much phi...
This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal pe...
Legal argumentation has become one of the prominent research domains of legal philosophy in the last...
The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century,...
This paper investigates how the logical aspects of legal language determine possibilities to attack ...
The present work will investigate in the most important aspects of the logic of the reasonable, in w...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
© 1996 Daniel Ashley Douglas HunterOver the past few decades there has emerged a group of researcher...
The aim of this paper is to describe the standing position of legal argumentation for normative syst...