Add to ORKGThe dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the following discussion of the nature of legal reasoning. In the course of the dialogue the author notes similarities and dissimilarities between legal reasoning and philosophical and mathematical reasoning. In the end we are left with a clearer insight into the distinctive features of the adjudicative process
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
This paper discusses the comparative legal reasoning of Asy Syatibi and Gustav Radbruch in their phi...
Considerations of general jurisprudence are undertaken in three disciplines of knowledge recognised ...
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the foll...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are m...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
Legal science covers a limited scope since it only focuses on norms or law. Many problems relating t...
The problem of the choice of methods of knowledge of legal reality, including criminal law and legal...
The paper challenges the view that the metaphysical grounding of the law - in contrast to other doma...
From the very beginning, philosophical reflection on law has been confronted with questions of legal...
Philosophy of law is a branch of philosophy that deals with philosophical questions about law. This ...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
The philosophy of law is not separate from but dependent upon ethics and political philosophy, which...
The relationship between logic and law has been a troublesome one and it has been object of much phi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
This paper discusses the comparative legal reasoning of Asy Syatibi and Gustav Radbruch in their phi...
Considerations of general jurisprudence are undertaken in three disciplines of knowledge recognised ...
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the foll...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are m...
For more than a century, lawyers have written about legal reasoning, and the flow of books and artic...
Legal science covers a limited scope since it only focuses on norms or law. Many problems relating t...
The problem of the choice of methods of knowledge of legal reality, including criminal law and legal...
The paper challenges the view that the metaphysical grounding of the law - in contrast to other doma...
From the very beginning, philosophical reflection on law has been confronted with questions of legal...
Philosophy of law is a branch of philosophy that deals with philosophical questions about law. This ...
This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. I...
The philosophy of law is not separate from but dependent upon ethics and political philosophy, which...
The relationship between logic and law has been a troublesome one and it has been object of much phi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
This paper discusses the comparative legal reasoning of Asy Syatibi and Gustav Radbruch in their phi...
Considerations of general jurisprudence are undertaken in three disciplines of knowledge recognised ...