Add to ORKGThese are my materials (a short precis, and replies to John MacFarlane, Mitchell Green, Ryan Wasserman, and Anthony Bigg and Kristie Miller) for a symposium on my book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False_ (OUP, 2021) in *Analytic Philosophy*. [The contribution from MacFarlane is available on his website, those from Wasserman and Green are on their Academia profiles, and the contribution from Bigg and Miller is on Miller's PhilPapers profile.
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
In this contribution I reply to commentators for the book symposium on my *Moore and Wittgenstein. S...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to John MacFarlane, Mitchell Green, Ryan Wasserm...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
International audienceTheoretical and methodological crossover between the field of Futures Studies ...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
For a book symposium in Disputatio on Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz's Nothing to Com
In this essay I respond to three of the most forceful objections to the open view of the future. It ...
Abstract There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all ...
Open theists deny that God knows future contingents. Most open theists justify this denial by adopti...
There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all believe t...
The supporters of Indeterminate Futurism Theory [IFT] suggest three different reasons for preferring...
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
In this contribution I reply to commentators for the book symposium on my *Moore and Wittgenstein. S...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to John MacFarlane, Mitchell Green, Ryan Wasserm...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
International audienceTheoretical and methodological crossover between the field of Futures Studies ...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
For a book symposium in Disputatio on Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz's Nothing to Com
In this essay I respond to three of the most forceful objections to the open view of the future. It ...
Abstract There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all ...
Open theists deny that God knows future contingents. Most open theists justify this denial by adopti...
There is a long-standing disagreement among Branching-Time theorists. Even though they all believe t...
The supporters of Indeterminate Futurism Theory [IFT] suggest three different reasons for preferring...
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
In this contribution I reply to commentators for the book symposium on my *Moore and Wittgenstein. S...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...