Add to ORKGThis book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open future. Patrick Todd argues that all claims about undetermined aspects of the future are simply false
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is 'open,' i.e., there i...
Open theists deny that God knows future contingents. Most open theists justify this denial by adopti...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
BOOK REVIEW Patrick Todd, OPEN FUTURE: WHY FUTURE CONTINGENTS ARE ALL FALSE, Oxford University Press...
Patrick Todd's The Open Future defends the view that all future contingent statements, like ‘It will...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
In “The Open Future” (2021) Patrick Todd argues that the future is open, and that as a consequence a...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
A commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed o...
At least since Aristotle’s famous 'sea-battle' passages in On Interpretation 9, some substantial min...
In a recently published paper, Todd (Mind, 125(499), pp. 775-798, 2016a) advocates a novel treatmen...
This is a review of Patrick Todd's book: Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are ...
Various philosophers have long since been attracted to the doctrine that future contingent propositi...
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is 'open,' i.e., there i...
Open theists deny that God knows future contingents. Most open theists justify this denial by adopti...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
BOOK REVIEW Patrick Todd, OPEN FUTURE: WHY FUTURE CONTINGENTS ARE ALL FALSE, Oxford University Press...
Patrick Todd's The Open Future defends the view that all future contingent statements, like ‘It will...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
In “The Open Future” (2021) Patrick Todd argues that the future is open, and that as a consequence a...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
A commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed o...
At least since Aristotle’s famous 'sea-battle' passages in On Interpretation 9, some substantial min...
In a recently published paper, Todd (Mind, 125(499), pp. 775-798, 2016a) advocates a novel treatmen...
This is a review of Patrick Todd's book: Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are ...
Various philosophers have long since been attracted to the doctrine that future contingent propositi...
Invited discussion paper on Patrick Todd's book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All Fa...
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is 'open,' i.e., there i...
Open theists deny that God knows future contingents. Most open theists justify this denial by adopti...