The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being removed from the ambit of a matrimonial property claim needed legislative amendment and judicial reconsideration in order to prevent potential inequity of division. This article explores the problems and anomalies in the family trusts regime in the 1990s: the Matrimonial Property Act 1976, the Trustee Act 1956, and s 182 of the Family Proceedings Act 1980. The author concludes that the question of whether there is truly equity after separation might not be able to be avoided in an increasingly sophisticated financial society
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
Trusts are very common in New Zealand, but they are increasingly detrimentally affecting the rights ...
Deficiencies in the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) have led to allegations of sham trusts, ...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This article sets out some of the recent history of family property reform in New Zealand. The court...
In June 2009, at the Transcontinental Trusts conference in Geneva, His Honour Justice David Hayton s...
In June 2009, at the Transcontinental Trusts conference in Geneva, His Honour Justice David Hayton s...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
Students new to family law are likely to find that a significant portion of the syllabus focuses on ...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
The author presents a personal view of a possible future law of family property. At the heart of tha...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
Trusts are very common in New Zealand, but they are increasingly detrimentally affecting the rights ...
Deficiencies in the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) have led to allegations of sham trusts, ...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This article sets out some of the recent history of family property reform in New Zealand. The court...
In June 2009, at the Transcontinental Trusts conference in Geneva, His Honour Justice David Hayton s...
In June 2009, at the Transcontinental Trusts conference in Geneva, His Honour Justice David Hayton s...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
Students new to family law are likely to find that a significant portion of the syllabus focuses on ...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
The author presents a personal view of a possible future law of family property. At the heart of tha...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
Trusts are very common in New Zealand, but they are increasingly detrimentally affecting the rights ...
Deficiencies in the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) have led to allegations of sham trusts, ...