Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. In the absence of legislative action, the courts have been sympathetic to a range of arguments aimed at accessing trust assets that would have been subject to division between the parties but for the trust. None of these judicial responses adequately addresses the current deficiencies of the Property (Relationships) Act or the potential detriment to trusts and their beneficiaries. This paper considers a range of potential reforms and argues that any reform should seek to strike a balance between the social aims of a relationship property regime and the right of owners to structure their property interests as they wish
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
Deficiencies in the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) have led to allegations of sham trusts, ...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
When the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 was introduced, Tony Angelo and Bill Atkin analysed the Act i...
In 2001 Parliament enacted some far-reaching amendments to the Property (Relationships) Act aimed at...
The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the relationship between policy and law in the con...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This dissertation examines the “bundle of rights” theory as it meets at the intersection of trust an...
Section 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 was passed in 2001 as a substantial and controve...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
Deficiencies in the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) have led to allegations of sham trusts, ...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
When the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 was introduced, Tony Angelo and Bill Atkin analysed the Act i...
In 2001 Parliament enacted some far-reaching amendments to the Property (Relationships) Act aimed at...
The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the relationship between policy and law in the con...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This dissertation examines the “bundle of rights” theory as it meets at the intersection of trust an...
Section 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 was passed in 2001 as a substantial and controve...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...