In 2001 Parliament enacted some far-reaching amendments to the Property (Relationships) Act aimed at bolstering the equal sharing regime and removing obstacles to equality to secure an equitable outcome for spouses and partners. However, the changes made to s 9A — the provision that enables Increases in value of separate property to be converted to relationship property — fail in this regard. This article will demonstrate that s 9A is now conceptually incoherent, internally inconsistent and incompatible with the aims and principles of the Property (Relationships) Act. Indeed, the amendments to s 9A are a retrograde step that have undermined the coherent approach to the classification and division of increases in value of separate property t...
Rebecca Probert, University of Warwick. In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 1 FLR 1858 the Hous...
The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the relationship between policy and law in the con...
This article takes issue with two assumptions commonly present in recent English family law scholars...
In 2001 Parliament enacted some far-reaching amendments to the Property (Relationships) Act aimed at...
When the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 was introduced, Tony Angelo and Bill Atkin analysed the Act i...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
In February 2002, when the Property (Relationships) Act came into force, unmarried couples in New Ze...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
This is the author accepted manuscript, made available by publisher permission. The final version is...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
Exploring economic disparity on divorce: A New Zealand perspective on a vexing problem. The thesi...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
Section 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 was passed in 2001 as a substantial and controve...
Rebecca Probert, University of Warwick. In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 1 FLR 1858 the Hous...
The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the relationship between policy and law in the con...
This article takes issue with two assumptions commonly present in recent English family law scholars...
In 2001 Parliament enacted some far-reaching amendments to the Property (Relationships) Act aimed at...
When the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 was introduced, Tony Angelo and Bill Atkin analysed the Act i...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
In February 2002, when the Property (Relationships) Act came into force, unmarried couples in New Ze...
Trusts emerge regularly in relationship property disputes and they are generally well understood to ...
This is the author accepted manuscript, made available by publisher permission. The final version is...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
It is generally assumed that financial apportionment between cohabiting parties, when the relationsh...
Exploring economic disparity on divorce: A New Zealand perspective on a vexing problem. The thesi...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
Section 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 was passed in 2001 as a substantial and controve...
Rebecca Probert, University of Warwick. In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 1 FLR 1858 the Hous...
The central theme of this paper is an analysis of the relationship between policy and law in the con...
This article takes issue with two assumptions commonly present in recent English family law scholars...