FIGURE 7. Hypothesis O7 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Mello-Leitão 1944). This author combined some older hypotheses such as the dichotomy Laniatores versus Palpatores (still using the original Thorell's concept) and reintroduced the Apagosterni.Published as part of Kury, Adriano B., 2015, Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida), pp. 301-340 in Zootaxa 3925 (3) on page 312, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/28797
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 17. Hypothesis L6 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Shultz 1998). Shultz morphological analysis...
FIGURE 8. Hypothesis O8 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Šilhavý 1961). This author presented a hypoth...
FIGURE 4. Hypothesis O4 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Simon 1879). Simon was the first to define a ...
FIGURE 5. Hypothesis O5 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Pocock 1902). Pocock suggested a group formed...
FIGURE 9. Hypothesis O9 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Martens 1980, morphological, non-numerical). ...
FIGURE 1. Hypothesis O1 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Latreille 1802). The clade which is today cal...
FIGURE 11. Hypothesis O11 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Giribet et al. 1999, comb; 2002, comb). Fol...
FIGURE 10. Hypothesis O10 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Shultz 1998, morph). This analysis recovere...
FIGURE 3. Hypothesis O3 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Thorell 1876). Thorell created the name Palpa...
FIGURE 6. Hypothesis O6 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Hansen & Sørensen 1904). The Danes kept the s...
FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating ...
FIGURE 2. Hypothesis O2 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Sundevall 1833). The original concept of the ...
FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause...
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 17. Hypothesis L6 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Shultz 1998). Shultz morphological analysis...
FIGURE 8. Hypothesis O8 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Šilhavý 1961). This author presented a hypoth...
FIGURE 4. Hypothesis O4 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Simon 1879). Simon was the first to define a ...
FIGURE 5. Hypothesis O5 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Pocock 1902). Pocock suggested a group formed...
FIGURE 9. Hypothesis O9 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Martens 1980, morphological, non-numerical). ...
FIGURE 1. Hypothesis O1 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Latreille 1802). The clade which is today cal...
FIGURE 11. Hypothesis O11 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Giribet et al. 1999, comb; 2002, comb). Fol...
FIGURE 10. Hypothesis O10 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Shultz 1998, morph). This analysis recovere...
FIGURE 3. Hypothesis O3 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Thorell 1876). Thorell created the name Palpa...
FIGURE 6. Hypothesis O6 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Hansen & Sørensen 1904). The Danes kept the s...
FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating ...
FIGURE 2. Hypothesis O2 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Sundevall 1833). The original concept of the ...
FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause...
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 17. Hypothesis L6 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Shultz 1998). Shultz morphological analysis...