FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 in Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)

  • Kury, Adriano B.
Publication date
December 2015

Abstract

FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating the Insidiatores, Loman (1903) separated the Oncopodidae (which he called Sterrhonoti, here represented by Gnomulus) against the other Laniatores sensu stricto, called Camptonoti. This hypothesis lost support with the removal of the Cladonychiidae (here represented by Erebomaster) from the Phalangodidae by Briggs (1969).Published as part of Kury, Adriano B., 2015, Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida), pp. 301-340 in Zootaxa 3925 (3) on page 319, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/28797

Extracted data

Related items

FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 in Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)
  • Kury, Adriano B.
December 2015

FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...

FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 in Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)
  • Kury, Adriano B.
December 2015

FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...

FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 in Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)
  • Kury, Adriano B.
December 2015

FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause...

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.