FIGURE 2. Hypothesis O2 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Sundevall 1833). The original concept of the Opiliones ("Opiliones" in green) excluded the Cyphophthalmi (here represented by Siro). This group is currently called Phalangida (in blue). Ischyropsalis was still to be unknown for 6 years.Published as part of Kury, Adriano B., 2015, Opiliones are no longer the same—on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida), pp. 301-340 in Zootaxa 3925 (3) on page 307, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/28797
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 16. Hypothesis L5 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Šilhavý (1961). Šilhavý recognized the Travu...
FIGURE 1. Hypothesis O1 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Latreille 1802). The clade which is today cal...
FIGURE 11. Hypothesis O11 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Giribet et al. 1999, comb; 2002, comb). Fol...
FIGURE 3. Hypothesis O3 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Thorell 1876). Thorell created the name Palpa...
FIGURE 7. Hypothesis O7 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Mello-Leitão 1944). This author combined some...
FIGURE 5. Hypothesis O5 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Pocock 1902). Pocock suggested a group formed...
FIGURE 4. Hypothesis O4 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Simon 1879). Simon was the first to define a ...
FIGURE 8. Hypothesis O8 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Šilhavý 1961). This author presented a hypoth...
FIGURE 10. Hypothesis O10 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Shultz 1998, morph). This analysis recovere...
FIGURE 9. Hypothesis O9 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Martens 1980, morphological, non-numerical). ...
FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating ...
FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause...
FIGURE 6. Hypothesis O6 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Hansen & Sørensen 1904). The Danes kept the s...
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 16. Hypothesis L5 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Šilhavý (1961). Šilhavý recognized the Travu...
FIGURE 1. Hypothesis O1 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Latreille 1802). The clade which is today cal...
FIGURE 11. Hypothesis O11 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Giribet et al. 1999, comb; 2002, comb). Fol...
FIGURE 3. Hypothesis O3 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Thorell 1876). Thorell created the name Palpa...
FIGURE 7. Hypothesis O7 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Mello-Leitão 1944). This author combined some...
FIGURE 5. Hypothesis O5 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Pocock 1902). Pocock suggested a group formed...
FIGURE 4. Hypothesis O4 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Simon 1879). Simon was the first to define a ...
FIGURE 8. Hypothesis O8 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Šilhavý 1961). This author presented a hypoth...
FIGURE 10. Hypothesis O10 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Shultz 1998, morph). This analysis recovere...
FIGURE 9. Hypothesis O9 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Martens 1980, morphological, non-numerical). ...
FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating ...
FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause...
FIGURE 6. Hypothesis O6 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Hansen & Sørensen 1904). The Danes kept the s...
FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a s...
FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster...
FIGURE 16. Hypothesis L5 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Šilhavý (1961). Šilhavý recognized the Travu...