Pat Jackson, Fred Chernoff and Heikki Patomäki are scholars with deservedly distinguished reputations. They anchor three different approaches to cause and advocate them in thought-ful and intelligent ways. I offer a very different approach, one that shares some things in common with each of theirs, but differs from them in important ways. The reviewers are not quite sure what to make of my approach to cause, in large part because they are so committed to their own. They end up using their approaches to criticize mine, rather than evaluating it on its own terms
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
In this reply to my critics (Monika Bobako, Krzysztof Brzechczyn, Ewa Domańska, Juliusz Iwanicki, Av...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
Raimo Tuomola has complained that my critical review of his The Philosophy of Sociality is superfici...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
It is a real pleasure to reply to so many thoughtful and probing responses to my book. In what follo...
Marc Jeannerod and I wrote a Précis of our 2003 book Ways of Seeing. The journal Dialogue asked Tim ...
Professor Frederic L. Pryer responds to his critics, Professors Patrick McGuire, Joan Huber, Paul M....
I am humbled and honored by the engagement of these four scholars, all of whom have significantly in...
Long ago, George Sarton set down criteria for reviewers. In addition to insisting on the need to com...
university of minnesota During the Winter of 2011 i visited SaDaf and gave a series of talks based o...
My article on refugee burden-sharing ( Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal, 22 YALE J. INT\u2...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
Nothing quite compares to the exhilaration that an author feels when his work is being noticed. With...
Science isn’t about being right. It is about convincing others of the correctness of an idea through...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
In this reply to my critics (Monika Bobako, Krzysztof Brzechczyn, Ewa Domańska, Juliusz Iwanicki, Av...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
Raimo Tuomola has complained that my critical review of his The Philosophy of Sociality is superfici...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
It is a real pleasure to reply to so many thoughtful and probing responses to my book. In what follo...
Marc Jeannerod and I wrote a Précis of our 2003 book Ways of Seeing. The journal Dialogue asked Tim ...
Professor Frederic L. Pryer responds to his critics, Professors Patrick McGuire, Joan Huber, Paul M....
I am humbled and honored by the engagement of these four scholars, all of whom have significantly in...
Long ago, George Sarton set down criteria for reviewers. In addition to insisting on the need to com...
university of minnesota During the Winter of 2011 i visited SaDaf and gave a series of talks based o...
My article on refugee burden-sharing ( Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal, 22 YALE J. INT\u2...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
Nothing quite compares to the exhilaration that an author feels when his work is being noticed. With...
Science isn’t about being right. It is about convincing others of the correctness of an idea through...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...
In this reply to my critics (Monika Bobako, Krzysztof Brzechczyn, Ewa Domańska, Juliusz Iwanicki, Av...
I am deeply grateful to Amy Allen, Fred Rush, Morton Schoolman and Robert Sinnerbrink for their care...