Professor Frederic L. Pryer responds to his critics, Professors Patrick McGuire, Joan Huber, Paul M. Hirsch, Jonathon Mate, David Jaffee, Arthur L. Stinchcombe, Dennis Wrong, Judith Treas, Patrick Baert, Olav Velthuis, and John B. Davis. These comments are in The American Journal of Economics ann Sociology, this issue, pp. 35-78
Summary. This is a critique of Polèse’s recent paper entitled ‘Cities and national economic growth:...
RéponseInternational audienceThis is a reply to a set of criticisms regarding a previously published...
I want to say just a few words about the arguments critics Smith and Carter (1989) use in their comm...
Professor Frederic L. Pryer responds to his critics, Professors Patrick McGuire, Joan Huber, Paul M....
Pat Jackson, Fred Chernoff and Heikki Patomäki are scholars with deservedly distinguished reputation...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
The Journal of Economic Literature received numerous unusually strong reactions, including one from...
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in...
Reply by the current authors to the comments made by Thomas E. Nichols and Jean-Baptist Poline; Tal ...
The release of the CSIRO Future Dilemmas report on population environment futures sparked a widespre...
URL : http://www.itas.kit.edu/english/events_2012_summerschool.phpScientific Knowledge and the Trans...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
I was asked by IPMR to comment on the above article. As a prior blind reviewer of this article, I re...
Author's comment: Review of: Schmid, Allan. Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and behavioral e...
Provides a comment on Reiss’ “Mathematics in economics: Schmoller, Menger and Jevons”.Economics, Mat...
Summary. This is a critique of Polèse’s recent paper entitled ‘Cities and national economic growth:...
RéponseInternational audienceThis is a reply to a set of criticisms regarding a previously published...
I want to say just a few words about the arguments critics Smith and Carter (1989) use in their comm...
Professor Frederic L. Pryer responds to his critics, Professors Patrick McGuire, Joan Huber, Paul M....
Pat Jackson, Fred Chernoff and Heikki Patomäki are scholars with deservedly distinguished reputation...
I want to take this opportunity to thank the contributors to this symposium for their astute comment...
The Journal of Economic Literature received numerous unusually strong reactions, including one from...
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in...
Reply by the current authors to the comments made by Thomas E. Nichols and Jean-Baptist Poline; Tal ...
The release of the CSIRO Future Dilemmas report on population environment futures sparked a widespre...
URL : http://www.itas.kit.edu/english/events_2012_summerschool.phpScientific Knowledge and the Trans...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
I was asked by IPMR to comment on the above article. As a prior blind reviewer of this article, I re...
Author's comment: Review of: Schmid, Allan. Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and behavioral e...
Provides a comment on Reiss’ “Mathematics in economics: Schmoller, Menger and Jevons”.Economics, Mat...
Summary. This is a critique of Polèse’s recent paper entitled ‘Cities and national economic growth:...
RéponseInternational audienceThis is a reply to a set of criticisms regarding a previously published...
I want to say just a few words about the arguments critics Smith and Carter (1989) use in their comm...
DOI
Add to ORKG