A summary forest plot of the 46 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the impact of nerve injury models compared at different time points (number of hours from model induction to the first OFT assessment) to sham control on mouse thigmotaxis. For each comparison, an effect size was calculated using the Hedge’s g SMD method. Effect sizes were pooled using the random effects model. The size of the square represents the weight, which reflects the contribution of each comparison with the pooled effect estimate. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level comparisons.</p
Sixty cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling on total distance travelled in rats....
Forty-five cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling and drug treatment on total dis...
<p>Symbols represent the mean response ratio of the individual studies (squares) and of the entire a...
Forty-one cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of nerve injury models at (A) different time ...
A summary forest plot of the 116 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the impact of modelling com...
A summary forest plot of the 57 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the drug treatment effects o...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
A summary forest plot of the 90 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the drug treatment effects o...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
Forty-nine cohort comparisons assessed the impact of modelling on total distance travelled in mice. ...
Thirty-two cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact. The overall effect size is 1.33 [95%CI 0.42...
A summary forest plot of the 91 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the impact of modelling comp...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
<p>Symbols represent the mean response ratio of the individual studies (squares) and of the entire a...
Sixty cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling on total distance travelled in rats....
Forty-five cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling and drug treatment on total dis...
<p>Symbols represent the mean response ratio of the individual studies (squares) and of the entire a...
Forty-one cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of nerve injury models at (A) different time ...
A summary forest plot of the 116 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the impact of modelling com...
A summary forest plot of the 57 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the drug treatment effects o...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
A summary forest plot of the 90 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the drug treatment effects o...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
Forty-nine cohort comparisons assessed the impact of modelling on total distance travelled in mice. ...
Thirty-two cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact. The overall effect size is 1.33 [95%CI 0.42...
A summary forest plot of the 91 cohort-level comparisons which assessed the impact of modelling comp...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
The size of the square represents the weight. CI, confidence interval; k, number of cohort-level com...
<p>Symbols represent the mean response ratio of the individual studies (squares) and of the entire a...
Sixty cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling on total distance travelled in rats....
Forty-five cohort-level comparisons assessed the impact of modelling and drug treatment on total dis...
<p>Symbols represent the mean response ratio of the individual studies (squares) and of the entire a...