The severity of bias in respondents' self-reports due to acquiescence response style (ARS) and extreme response style (ERS) depends strongly on how consistent these response styles are over the course of a questionnaire. In the literature, different alternative hypotheses on response style (in) consistency circulate. Therefore, nine alternative models are derived and fitted to secondary and primary data. It is found that response styles are best modeled as a tau-equivalent factor complemented with a time-invariant autoregressive effect. This means that ARS and ERS are largely but not completely consistent over the course of a questionnaire, a finding that has important implications for response style measurement and correction
It is well known that respondents answer items not only on the basis of the question content, but al...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...
The consistency of extreme response style (ERS) and non-extreme response style (NERS) across the lat...
The severity of bias in respondents' self-reports due to acquiescence response style (ARS) and extre...
In survey research, acquiescence response style/set (ARS) and extreme response style/set (ERS) may d...
This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response styl...
The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. In contrast with previous s...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
Extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response style (ARS) are among the most encountered pr...
Measurement equivalence or invariance is the prerequisite for cross‐cultural survey research. One of...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
When respondents use different ways to answer rating scale items, they employ so-called response sty...
AbstractIt is well known that the self-report survey method suffers from many idiosyncratic biases, ...
This article extends a methodological approach considered by Bolt and Johnson for the measurement an...
It is well known that respondents answer items not only on the basis of the question content, but al...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...
The consistency of extreme response style (ERS) and non-extreme response style (NERS) across the lat...
The severity of bias in respondents' self-reports due to acquiescence response style (ARS) and extre...
In survey research, acquiescence response style/set (ARS) and extreme response style/set (ERS) may d...
This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response styl...
The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. In contrast with previous s...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
Extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response style (ARS) are among the most encountered pr...
Measurement equivalence or invariance is the prerequisite for cross‐cultural survey research. One of...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
When respondents use different ways to answer rating scale items, they employ so-called response sty...
AbstractIt is well known that the self-report survey method suffers from many idiosyncratic biases, ...
This article extends a methodological approach considered by Bolt and Johnson for the measurement an...
It is well known that respondents answer items not only on the basis of the question content, but al...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...
The consistency of extreme response style (ERS) and non-extreme response style (NERS) across the lat...