This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response style (ARS) over a period of 8 years. ERS and ARS were measured with item sets drawn randomly from a large pool of items used in an ongoing German panel study. Latent-trait-state-occasion and latent-state models were applied to test the relationship between time-specific (state) response style behaviors and time-invariant trait components of response styles. The results show that across different random item samples, on average between 49% and 59% of the variance in the state response style factors was explained by the trait response style factors. This indicates that the systematic differences respondents show in their preferences for certain re...
This article extends a methodological approach considered by Bolt and Johnson for the measurement an...
We investigated how response styles, personality traits, and values can be taken as manifestations o...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...
This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response styl...
The severity of bias in respondents' self-reports due to acquiescence response style (ARS) and extre...
The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. In contrast with previous s...
In survey research, acquiescence response style/set (ARS) and extreme response style/set (ERS) may d...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
The consistency of extreme response style (ERS) and non-extreme response style (NERS) across the lat...
AbstractIt is well known that the self-report survey method suffers from many idiosyncratic biases, ...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
The purpose of this study was to explore various ways to predict and measure extreme response style,...
When respondents use different ways to answer rating scale items, they employ so-called response sty...
This article extends a methodological approach considered by Bolt and Johnson for the measurement an...
We investigated how response styles, personality traits, and values can be taken as manifestations o...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...
This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response styl...
The severity of bias in respondents' self-reports due to acquiescence response style (ARS) and extre...
The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. In contrast with previous s...
In survey research, acquiescence response style/set (ARS) and extreme response style/set (ERS) may d...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
The consistency of extreme response style (ERS) and non-extreme response style (NERS) across the lat...
AbstractIt is well known that the self-report survey method suffers from many idiosyncratic biases, ...
This research note addresses the challenge of how to optimally measure acquiescence response style (...
The purpose of this study was to explore various ways to predict and measure extreme response style,...
When respondents use different ways to answer rating scale items, they employ so-called response sty...
This article extends a methodological approach considered by Bolt and Johnson for the measurement an...
We investigated how response styles, personality traits, and values can be taken as manifestations o...
Studies concerning the impact of the length of response scales on the measurement of attitudes have ...