Both in philosophy and in psychology, human rationality has traditionally been studied from an "individualistic" perspective. Recently, social epistemologists have drawn attention to the fact that epistemic interactions among agents also give rise to important questions concerning rationality. In previous work, we have used a formal model to assess the risk that a particular type of social-epistemic interactions lead agents with initially consistent belief states into inconsistent belief states. Here, we continue this work by investigating the dynamics to which these interactions may give rise in the population as a whole
Models of rational choice use different definitions of rationality. However, there is no clear descr...
This book describes how the concept of rationality has evolved in the last decades. Since the early ...
Rational choice theory which remains the major paradigm in social sciences has been challenged sever...
Both in philosophy and in psychology, human rationality has traditionally been studied from an "indi...
Both in philosophy and in psychology, human rationality has traditionally been studied from an “indi...
Recently, both evolutionary anthropologists and some philosophers have argued that cooperative socia...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
National audienceMust social sciences attempt to explain the belief-forming process by examining the...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
A successful scientific community might require different scientists to form different beliefs even ...
International audienceAbout this bookThis book contributes to the developing dialogue between cognit...
How much does rationality constrain what we should believe on the basis of our evidence? According t...
In the social sciences, within the explanatory paradigm of structural individualism, a theory of ...
When an agent A depends on an agent B to promote one of A's epistemic goals, this will often involve...
This book proposes an applied epistemological framework for investigating science, social cognition ...
Models of rational choice use different definitions of rationality. However, there is no clear descr...
This book describes how the concept of rationality has evolved in the last decades. Since the early ...
Rational choice theory which remains the major paradigm in social sciences has been challenged sever...
Both in philosophy and in psychology, human rationality has traditionally been studied from an "indi...
Both in philosophy and in psychology, human rationality has traditionally been studied from an “indi...
Recently, both evolutionary anthropologists and some philosophers have argued that cooperative socia...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
National audienceMust social sciences attempt to explain the belief-forming process by examining the...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
A successful scientific community might require different scientists to form different beliefs even ...
International audienceAbout this bookThis book contributes to the developing dialogue between cognit...
How much does rationality constrain what we should believe on the basis of our evidence? According t...
In the social sciences, within the explanatory paradigm of structural individualism, a theory of ...
When an agent A depends on an agent B to promote one of A's epistemic goals, this will often involve...
This book proposes an applied epistemological framework for investigating science, social cognition ...
Models of rational choice use different definitions of rationality. However, there is no clear descr...
This book describes how the concept of rationality has evolved in the last decades. Since the early ...
Rational choice theory which remains the major paradigm in social sciences has been challenged sever...