The concept of a “validator” as a unit of evidence for the validity of a psychiatric category has been important for more than fifty years. Validator evidence is aggregated by expert committees (for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), these are referred to as “workgroups”), which use the results to make nosological decisions. Through an examination of the recent history of psychiatric research, this paper argues that it is time to reassess this traditional practice. It concludes with specific suggestions for going forward
The DSM-I is currently viewed as a psychoanalytic classification, and therefore unimportant. There a...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...
The failure of psychiatry to validate its diagnostic constructs is often attributed to the prioritiz...
A pressing need for interrater reliability in the diagnosis of mental disorders emerged du...
The assumption that eventually the classification in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnost...
The revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) provides a useful op...
Methodically sound psychiatric diagnoses are necessary quality-assuring elements in forensic psychia...
In this dissertation, I argue that the discussion surrounding the role of values in the conceptualiz...
Contemporary psychiatry finds itself in the midst of a crisis of classification. The developments be...
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is a classification of mental disord...
The reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses have always been a major concern. The Diagnost...
Many of the current debates about validity in psychiatry and psychology are predicated on the unexpe...
This article traces the history of classification systems for mental illness and then reviews the hi...
This essay critically evaluates the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edi...
The DSM-I is currently viewed as a psychoanalytic classification, and therefore unimportant. There a...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...
The failure of psychiatry to validate its diagnostic constructs is often attributed to the prioritiz...
A pressing need for interrater reliability in the diagnosis of mental disorders emerged du...
The assumption that eventually the classification in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnost...
The revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) provides a useful op...
Methodically sound psychiatric diagnoses are necessary quality-assuring elements in forensic psychia...
In this dissertation, I argue that the discussion surrounding the role of values in the conceptualiz...
Contemporary psychiatry finds itself in the midst of a crisis of classification. The developments be...
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is a classification of mental disord...
The reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses have always been a major concern. The Diagnost...
Many of the current debates about validity in psychiatry and psychology are predicated on the unexpe...
This article traces the history of classification systems for mental illness and then reviews the hi...
This essay critically evaluates the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edi...
The DSM-I is currently viewed as a psychoanalytic classification, and therefore unimportant. There a...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...
This dissertation has three tasks: to analyze the philosophy behind our current psychiatric nosology...