The failure of psychiatry to validate its diagnostic constructs is often attributed to the prioritizing of reliability over validity in the structure and content of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Here I argue that in fact what has retarded biomedical approaches to psychopathology is unwarranted optimism about diagnostic discrimination: the assumption that our diagnostic tests group patients together in ways that allow for relevant facts about mental disorder to be discovered. I consider the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework as a new paradigm for classifying objects of psychiatric research that solves some of the challenges brought on by this assumption
© 2019 The theory and practice of psychiatric diagnosis are central yet contentious. This paper exam...
Psychiatric researchers typically assume that the modelling of psychiatric symptoms is not influence...
This article explores the epistemological underpinnings of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), laun...
The assumption that eventually the classification in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnost...
A pressing need for interrater reliability in the diagnosis of mental disorders emerged du...
Contemporary psychiatry finds itself in the midst of a crisis of classification. The developments be...
The recent discussions over the reliability, validity, utility, humanity and epistemology of psychi...
The reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses have always been a major concern. The Diagnost...
Background: Some believe that Psychiatry relies solely on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of M...
The two main psychiatric taxonomies set out codifications of psychiatric diagnoses via lists of symp...
Editor’s Note: If all goes as planned, the American Psychiatric Association will release a new Diagn...
The concept of a “validator” as a unit of evidence for the validity of a psychiatric category has be...
In the absence of clear evidence for the validity of diagnostic categories, all diag-nostic systems ...
At present, psychiatric disorders are characterized descriptively, as the standard within ...
In this dissertation, I argue that the discussion surrounding the role of values in the conceptualiz...
© 2019 The theory and practice of psychiatric diagnosis are central yet contentious. This paper exam...
Psychiatric researchers typically assume that the modelling of psychiatric symptoms is not influence...
This article explores the epistemological underpinnings of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), laun...
The assumption that eventually the classification in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnost...
A pressing need for interrater reliability in the diagnosis of mental disorders emerged du...
Contemporary psychiatry finds itself in the midst of a crisis of classification. The developments be...
The recent discussions over the reliability, validity, utility, humanity and epistemology of psychi...
The reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses have always been a major concern. The Diagnost...
Background: Some believe that Psychiatry relies solely on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of M...
The two main psychiatric taxonomies set out codifications of psychiatric diagnoses via lists of symp...
Editor’s Note: If all goes as planned, the American Psychiatric Association will release a new Diagn...
The concept of a “validator” as a unit of evidence for the validity of a psychiatric category has be...
In the absence of clear evidence for the validity of diagnostic categories, all diag-nostic systems ...
At present, psychiatric disorders are characterized descriptively, as the standard within ...
In this dissertation, I argue that the discussion surrounding the role of values in the conceptualiz...
© 2019 The theory and practice of psychiatric diagnosis are central yet contentious. This paper exam...
Psychiatric researchers typically assume that the modelling of psychiatric symptoms is not influence...
This article explores the epistemological underpinnings of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), laun...