Comparison of the percentage of (A) CD4+ and (B) CD8+ T cells expressing HLA-DR, Ki-67, CD38, and CD69 activation markers between the groups. High-risk group (n = 16), low-risk group (n = 44). All data are reported after background correction. The comparison was performed with the Mann–Whitney U-test or Student T-test according to the data distribution.</p
<p>(A) Representative flow cytometry dot-plots showing the level of Ki-67 and HLA-DR co-expression w...
<p>(1) n = 33 patients and 27 controls from both surveys.</p><p>(2) n = 16 patients and 14 controls ...
<p>Correlation analysis of the proportion of CD38+/CD4+ T cells (<b>A</b>) or CD38+/CD8+ T cells (<b...
<p>The expression level of activation markers CD38 and HLA-DR were compared between VP group (square...
<p>All data are means with the error bars indicating standard deviations. Panels A and B present abs...
<p>Percentages of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells bearing activation markers: CD4<sup>+</sup>CD69<sup>+</sup> ...
<p>Activated cells were considered those expressing high levels of CD38 (CD38 bright) and MHC class ...
<p>Peripheral blood was incubated with monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR and CD38 on T-cells: (A)...
A. The overall expression level for all participants are represented by the white bars, and the grey...
<p>(A) Total CD8+ T-cells (grey) vs. antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells (black) belonging to the differen...
Activation markers (CD69, CD25, CD71, and CD38) plotted against nutrient sensors (GLUT1, GLUT4, HK1,...
<p>Rectal cells were incubated with monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR and CD38 on T-cells: (A) CD...
<p>(A) Time course analysis of the HLA-E<sub>UL40</sub> and HLA-A*02<sub>pp65</sub> CD8 T-cell respo...
<p>(A) Mononuclear cells from HC, MS-RR, and MS-PP were incubated with tetramers of HLA-E/A2 and HLA...
<p>Representative examples of longitudinal responses are shown for HLA-B*35 -Px+ Subjects 1 (A) and ...
<p>(A) Representative flow cytometry dot-plots showing the level of Ki-67 and HLA-DR co-expression w...
<p>(1) n = 33 patients and 27 controls from both surveys.</p><p>(2) n = 16 patients and 14 controls ...
<p>Correlation analysis of the proportion of CD38+/CD4+ T cells (<b>A</b>) or CD38+/CD8+ T cells (<b...
<p>The expression level of activation markers CD38 and HLA-DR were compared between VP group (square...
<p>All data are means with the error bars indicating standard deviations. Panels A and B present abs...
<p>Percentages of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells bearing activation markers: CD4<sup>+</sup>CD69<sup>+</sup> ...
<p>Activated cells were considered those expressing high levels of CD38 (CD38 bright) and MHC class ...
<p>Peripheral blood was incubated with monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR and CD38 on T-cells: (A)...
A. The overall expression level for all participants are represented by the white bars, and the grey...
<p>(A) Total CD8+ T-cells (grey) vs. antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells (black) belonging to the differen...
Activation markers (CD69, CD25, CD71, and CD38) plotted against nutrient sensors (GLUT1, GLUT4, HK1,...
<p>Rectal cells were incubated with monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR and CD38 on T-cells: (A) CD...
<p>(A) Time course analysis of the HLA-E<sub>UL40</sub> and HLA-A*02<sub>pp65</sub> CD8 T-cell respo...
<p>(A) Mononuclear cells from HC, MS-RR, and MS-PP were incubated with tetramers of HLA-E/A2 and HLA...
<p>Representative examples of longitudinal responses are shown for HLA-B*35 -Px+ Subjects 1 (A) and ...
<p>(A) Representative flow cytometry dot-plots showing the level of Ki-67 and HLA-DR co-expression w...
<p>(1) n = 33 patients and 27 controls from both surveys.</p><p>(2) n = 16 patients and 14 controls ...
<p>Correlation analysis of the proportion of CD38+/CD4+ T cells (<b>A</b>) or CD38+/CD8+ T cells (<b...