Add to ORKGThe general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent corporation at the suit of a minority stockholder, in the absence of special statutory authority. However, some of the cases which seem to support this rule hedge considerably by saying that ordinarily or generally equity has no such jurisdiction. These cases would seem little different than those which hold that a court of equity has inherent jurisdiction to dissolve a corporation but will exercise it only in cases of extreme necessity. The latter seems to be the prevailing view and on principle the best
The defendants, employees of the plaintiff corporation, were discharged by the president, who was em...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...
A recent New Jersey case, Naspo v. Summits Sweet Shoppe, Inc., suggests interesting questions of the...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
The directors of defendant, a New Jersey corporation, in an effort to effect corporate tax savings a...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
According to the common law a dissolved corporation ceased to exist for all purposes. Whether the di...
The exodus of small businesses from proprietorship and partnership units into corporate units has br...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
The defendants, employees of the plaintiff corporation, were discharged by the president, who was em...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...
A recent New Jersey case, Naspo v. Summits Sweet Shoppe, Inc., suggests interesting questions of the...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
The directors of defendant, a New Jersey corporation, in an effort to effect corporate tax savings a...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
According to the common law a dissolved corporation ceased to exist for all purposes. Whether the di...
The exodus of small businesses from proprietorship and partnership units into corporate units has br...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
The defendants, employees of the plaintiff corporation, were discharged by the president, who was em...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...
A recent New Jersey case, Naspo v. Summits Sweet Shoppe, Inc., suggests interesting questions of the...