Add to ORKGThe general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent corporation at the suit of a minority stockholder, in the absence of special statutory authority. However, some of the cases which seem to support this rule hedge considerably by saying that ordinarily or generally equity has no such jurisdiction. These cases would seem little different than those which hold that a court of equity has inherent jurisdiction to dissolve a corporation but will exercise it only in cases of extreme necessity. The latter seems to be the prevailing view and on principle the best
Investment in the corporate venture may sometimes be a risky venture for the minority shareholders....
To understand the potentially dramatic consequences of oppression in a close corporation it is in th...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
The directors of defendant, a New Jersey corporation, in an effort to effect corporate tax savings a...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
According to the common law a dissolved corporation ceased to exist for all purposes. Whether the di...
Intra-corporate dissension between shareholders in a close corporation that can lead to serious dead...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stoc...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Once a corporation ceases to exist, most courts permit neither primary nor derivative suits to be br...
Investment in the corporate venture may sometimes be a risky venture for the minority shareholders....
To understand the potentially dramatic consequences of oppression in a close corporation it is in th...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
The directors of defendant, a New Jersey corporation, in an effort to effect corporate tax savings a...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
According to the common law a dissolved corporation ceased to exist for all purposes. Whether the di...
Intra-corporate dissension between shareholders in a close corporation that can lead to serious dead...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stoc...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Once a corporation ceases to exist, most courts permit neither primary nor derivative suits to be br...
Investment in the corporate venture may sometimes be a risky venture for the minority shareholders....
To understand the potentially dramatic consequences of oppression in a close corporation it is in th...
A corporation\u27s articles of incorporation provided: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution...