The directors of defendant, a New Jersey corporation, in an effort to effect corporate tax savings and simplification of operations, submitted the following plan to its shareholders: Defendant was to sell all of its operating assets to X, a Pennsylvania corporation which had been formed by the directors and was to receive as consideration all of the capital stock of X. Then defendant was to be dissolved and X\u27s stock and any corporate surplus was to be distributed to the stockholders. The necessary two-thirds majority of the stockholders, as required by statute, voted to sell the operating assets and to dissolve. Plaintiff, a minority stockholder, sued to enjoin the sale and dissolution and prayed a temporary injunction pending final hea...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in the Kroger Company, brought a derivative suit against a subsidiary of th...
By action of its board of directors, defendant corporation entered into a written extension of a lea...
The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stoc...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
The defendants, employees of the plaintiff corporation, were discharged by the president, who was em...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
The defendants were directors, officers, and sole stockholders of a corporation engaged in the busin...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York and the owner of some preferred stock in the defendant Delaware cor...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in the Kroger Company, brought a derivative suit against a subsidiary of th...
By action of its board of directors, defendant corporation entered into a written extension of a lea...
The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stoc...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent ...
The stock in a hotel management corporation was divided equally between two families, each of which ...
Plaintiff stockholder brought a personal action against the president and majority stockholder for f...
ln 1945 appellant corporation was dissolved. Under a state statute, its officers became trustees, wi...
Defendant, a Michigan corporation, was incorporated in 1923 for a term of thirty years, the maximum ...
Plaintiffs, minority stockholders of defendant corporation, brought an equitable action against cert...
(Excerpt) This article will focus upon the addition to the arsenal of minority shareholders\u27 righ...
The defendants, employees of the plaintiff corporation, were discharged by the president, who was em...
Plaintiffs sought dissolution of defendant corporation pursuant to a statute allowing a petition for...
The defendants were directors, officers, and sole stockholders of a corporation engaged in the busin...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York and the owner of some preferred stock in the defendant Delaware cor...
Plaintiff, a stockholder in the Kroger Company, brought a derivative suit against a subsidiary of th...
By action of its board of directors, defendant corporation entered into a written extension of a lea...
The capital structure of the defendant corporation consisted of class A, class B, and preferred stoc...