In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has been abrogated by Congress, the authors argue that confusion over the proper judicial test for finding an abrogation all too often results in the destruction of precious American Indian treaty rights. They propose an objective test fully consonant with the importance of treaty guarantees and the unique relationship of American Indians to the federal government: that Indian treaty rights should be abrogated only by express legislative action stating both the specific promises about to be broken and the intent of Congress to break them
The Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA or “the Act”) of 1968 grants members of federally recognized India...
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction ...
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...
In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has be...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
This law review Article examines: (1) the underpinnings of tribal sovereignty within the American sy...
America\u27s indigenous nations occupy a distinctive political within the United States as separate ...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
The Indian Civil Rights Act, Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, extended portions of the Bill...
Tribes are in a unique position with respect to their ability to regulate within their territories. ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA or “the Act”) of 1968 grants members of federally recognized India...
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction ...
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...
In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has be...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
This law review Article examines: (1) the underpinnings of tribal sovereignty within the American sy...
America\u27s indigenous nations occupy a distinctive political within the United States as separate ...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
The Indian Civil Rights Act, Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, extended portions of the Bill...
Tribes are in a unique position with respect to their ability to regulate within their territories. ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA or “the Act”) of 1968 grants members of federally recognized India...
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction ...
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...