America\u27s indigenous nations occupy a distinctive political within the United States as separate sovereigns whose rights in the doctrine of inherent tribal sovereignty, affirmed in hundreds of ratified treaties and agreements, acknowledged in the Commerce the U.S. Constitution, and recognized in ample federal legislation case law. Ironically, while indigenous sovereignty is neither ally defined or delimited, it may be restricted or enhanced by One could argue, then, that indeterminacy or inconsistency of the tribal-federal political/legal relationship
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
Federal recognition of an Indian tribe’s sovereignty establishes a government-to-government relation...
In a series of cases beginning with its 1981 decision in Montana v. United States, the US. Supreme C...
The doctrine of inherent tribal sovereignty—that tribes retain aboriginal sovereign governing power ...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supr...
For the last thirty years the Supreme Court has been adjusting the boundaries of American Indian tri...
American Indian tribal sovereignty is viewed very differently in the United States Supreme Court tha...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
This Note analyzes the primary conflicts among the order of the District Court for the District of N...
The concept of tribal sovereignty frequently conflicts with that of congressional plenary power, dep...
The debate over which legal Indigenous Peoples should govern Native American political power and pro...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
In Aboriginal Rights and Judicial Wrongs: The Colonization of the Last Frontier, I examine a recent ...
Tribal sovereignty and self-government are essential to Native American cultural survival. Current l...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
Federal recognition of an Indian tribe’s sovereignty establishes a government-to-government relation...
In a series of cases beginning with its 1981 decision in Montana v. United States, the US. Supreme C...
The doctrine of inherent tribal sovereignty—that tribes retain aboriginal sovereign governing power ...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supr...
For the last thirty years the Supreme Court has been adjusting the boundaries of American Indian tri...
American Indian tribal sovereignty is viewed very differently in the United States Supreme Court tha...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
This Note analyzes the primary conflicts among the order of the District Court for the District of N...
The concept of tribal sovereignty frequently conflicts with that of congressional plenary power, dep...
The debate over which legal Indigenous Peoples should govern Native American political power and pro...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
In Aboriginal Rights and Judicial Wrongs: The Colonization of the Last Frontier, I examine a recent ...
Tribal sovereignty and self-government are essential to Native American cultural survival. Current l...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
Federal recognition of an Indian tribe’s sovereignty establishes a government-to-government relation...
In a series of cases beginning with its 1981 decision in Montana v. United States, the US. Supreme C...