In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has been abrogated by Congress, the authors argue that confusion over the proper judicial test for finding an abrogation all too often results in the destruction of precious American Indian treaty rights. They propose an objective test fully consonant with the importance of treaty guarantees and the unique relationship of American Indians to the federal government: that Indian treaty rights should be abrogated only by express legislative action stating both the specific promises about to be broken and the intent of Congress to break them
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supr...
This paper is part of a call for a paradigm-shifting re-examination by Indian tribes and Indian peop...
In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has be...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This law review Article examines: (1) the underpinnings of tribal sovereignty within the American sy...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA or “the Act”) of 1968 grants members of federally recognized India...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
This article reviews and analyzes the judicial canons of construction for Native American treaties a...
America\u27s indigenous nations occupy a distinctive political within the United States as separate ...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supr...
This paper is part of a call for a paradigm-shifting re-examination by Indian tribes and Indian peop...
In this insightful analysis of the role of the courts in determining whether an Indian treaty has be...
The treaties between the United States and the Indians constitute a critical recognition and guarant...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This law review Article examines: (1) the underpinnings of tribal sovereignty within the American sy...
In federal Indian law, the treaty operates as our foundational legal text. Reflecting centuries-old ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA or “the Act”) of 1968 grants members of federally recognized India...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
This article reviews and analyzes the judicial canons of construction for Native American treaties a...
America\u27s indigenous nations occupy a distinctive political within the United States as separate ...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Although the U.S. Congress prohibited treaties with Indians after 1871, there are significant parall...
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supr...
This paper is part of a call for a paradigm-shifting re-examination by Indian tribes and Indian peop...