(A) Gender ratio of all PhD students from 2000 to 2020, split across broad academic fields and mentor gender. Colors indicate mentor’s gender. Field abbreviations are reported in the legend. (B) Temporal trends in homophily, the tendency toward same-gender pairing between trainees and mentors. Each panel shows data from one major field. Lines show a linear regression of homophily as a function of graduation year. P values indicate significance of temporal trend. (C) Homophily within narrow research areas (n = 73 areas). Solid line indicates median. The data and code needed to generate this figure are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4722020).</p
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...
We examined the male-female collaboration practices of all internationally visible Polish university...
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...
Colors indicate mentors’ gender and time of graduation. Field abbreviations are reported in the key ...
(A) Mean percentage of men students among life sciences mentors divided by research area, mentor sta...
(A) Simulation of how measurements of gender homophily are affected by the gender composition of men...
Heatmaps show (A) fraction women mentors, (B) fraction women students, and (C) homophily, grouped by...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in each general research area. Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% conf...
(A) Distribution of mentor-status metrics among men and women mentors in life sciences (n: total num...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in narrow research areas with greater than 1,000 students. Error bars in...
Marginal effects predicted by logistic regression model on individual trainee’s continuation to ment...
(A) Fraction of women postdocs and mentors within fields, relative to fraction of women graduate stu...
(A) Mean continuation rate in academia for PhD students and postdocs in life sciences. Each panel sh...
Slope indicates annual change in homophily from 2000–2020, based on linear regression predicting hom...
Each row shows median gender homophily across all fields and years, marginal effect of trainee and m...
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...
We examined the male-female collaboration practices of all internationally visible Polish university...
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...
Colors indicate mentors’ gender and time of graduation. Field abbreviations are reported in the key ...
(A) Mean percentage of men students among life sciences mentors divided by research area, mentor sta...
(A) Simulation of how measurements of gender homophily are affected by the gender composition of men...
Heatmaps show (A) fraction women mentors, (B) fraction women students, and (C) homophily, grouped by...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in each general research area. Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% conf...
(A) Distribution of mentor-status metrics among men and women mentors in life sciences (n: total num...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in narrow research areas with greater than 1,000 students. Error bars in...
Marginal effects predicted by logistic regression model on individual trainee’s continuation to ment...
(A) Fraction of women postdocs and mentors within fields, relative to fraction of women graduate stu...
(A) Mean continuation rate in academia for PhD students and postdocs in life sciences. Each panel sh...
Slope indicates annual change in homophily from 2000–2020, based on linear regression predicting hom...
Each row shows median gender homophily across all fields and years, marginal effect of trainee and m...
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...
We examined the male-female collaboration practices of all internationally visible Polish university...
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...