Colors indicate mentors’ gender and time of graduation. Field abbreviations are reported in the key at lower right. The consistent pattern of homophily is reflected in the greater fraction of women trainees of women mentors (red), shifted up relative to trainees of men mentors (blue). The data and code needed to generate this figure are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4722020). (TIF)</p
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...
Dashed line indicates prediction of reduction for no interaction between status and seniority (i.e.,...
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...
(A) Gender ratio of all PhD students from 2000 to 2020, split across broad academic fields and mento...
(A) Mean percentage of men students among life sciences mentors divided by research area, mentor sta...
(A) Distribution of mentor-status metrics among men and women mentors in life sciences (n: total num...
(A) Fraction of women postdocs and mentors within fields, relative to fraction of women graduate stu...
Marginal effects predicted by logistic regression model on individual trainee’s continuation to ment...
Heatmaps show (A) fraction women mentors, (B) fraction women students, and (C) homophily, grouped by...
(A) Simulation of how measurements of gender homophily are affected by the gender composition of men...
(A) Mean continuation rate in academia for PhD students and postdocs in life sciences. Each panel sh...
Each row shows median gender homophily across all fields and years, marginal effect of trainee and m...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in narrow research areas with greater than 1,000 students. Error bars in...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in each general research area. Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% conf...
Item does not contain fulltextWomen and men often contribute differently to research knowledge. Do d...
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...
Dashed line indicates prediction of reduction for no interaction between status and seniority (i.e.,...
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...
(A) Gender ratio of all PhD students from 2000 to 2020, split across broad academic fields and mento...
(A) Mean percentage of men students among life sciences mentors divided by research area, mentor sta...
(A) Distribution of mentor-status metrics among men and women mentors in life sciences (n: total num...
(A) Fraction of women postdocs and mentors within fields, relative to fraction of women graduate stu...
Marginal effects predicted by logistic regression model on individual trainee’s continuation to ment...
Heatmaps show (A) fraction women mentors, (B) fraction women students, and (C) homophily, grouped by...
(A) Simulation of how measurements of gender homophily are affected by the gender composition of men...
(A) Mean continuation rate in academia for PhD students and postdocs in life sciences. Each panel sh...
Each row shows median gender homophily across all fields and years, marginal effect of trainee and m...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in narrow research areas with greater than 1,000 students. Error bars in...
(A) Bars indicate homophily in each general research area. Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% conf...
Item does not contain fulltextWomen and men often contribute differently to research knowledge. Do d...
: It is commonly known that there are large sex gaps in various degree programs within the United St...
Dashed line indicates prediction of reduction for no interaction between status and seniority (i.e.,...
Specifically, if most collaborations occur between career stages, there will be an excess of mixed-g...