Applicants’ self-cognitions toward selection procedures are decisive to produce favorable outcomes. Drawing upon the career self-management model, this study explored the impact of performance feedback after a simulated employment interview on interview self-efficacy (ISE) and outcome expectations. Participants (a sample of recent graduates; N = 240) were given timely feedback after the simulated interview with suggestions to improve their performance. The interviewer’s feedback was positively related to participants’ ISE measured after the feedback. A significant relationship between participants’ ISE and outcome expectations emerged. Feedback was related to outcome expectations only indirectly, via ISE. This study contributes to...
The study investigated the role of self-efficacy (general and task-specific) and justice perceptions...
In personnel selection procedures candidates usually try to make the “right” impression and act in l...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72121/1/j.1559-1816.2008.00369.x.pd
Applicants’ self-cognitions toward selection procedures are decisive to produce favorable outcomes. ...
Past research has found that verbal and nonverbal communication are both powerful vehicles for impre...
This study examined the incremental effectiveness of interview practice and feedback on candidates ’...
Psychological reactions towards personnel selection are acquiring growing importance, as they signif...
Performing well in an interview is of crucial importance to a job seeker. While much advice and trai...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between general self-efficacy (GSE...
This article presents results from two samples of applicants (total N = 368) for general practitione...
This study examined the incremental effectiveness of interview practice and feedback on candidates\u...
Although research demonstrates that self‐verification striving can have positive outcomes in the hir...
Prior research suggests that interviewers play an important role in representing their organization ...
Examines the contextual effects of social persuasion (represented by self, client, peer and supervis...
Purpose - Applicants often use impression management (IM) in employment interviews, and such tactics...
The study investigated the role of self-efficacy (general and task-specific) and justice perceptions...
In personnel selection procedures candidates usually try to make the “right” impression and act in l...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72121/1/j.1559-1816.2008.00369.x.pd
Applicants’ self-cognitions toward selection procedures are decisive to produce favorable outcomes. ...
Past research has found that verbal and nonverbal communication are both powerful vehicles for impre...
This study examined the incremental effectiveness of interview practice and feedback on candidates ’...
Psychological reactions towards personnel selection are acquiring growing importance, as they signif...
Performing well in an interview is of crucial importance to a job seeker. While much advice and trai...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between general self-efficacy (GSE...
This article presents results from two samples of applicants (total N = 368) for general practitione...
This study examined the incremental effectiveness of interview practice and feedback on candidates\u...
Although research demonstrates that self‐verification striving can have positive outcomes in the hir...
Prior research suggests that interviewers play an important role in representing their organization ...
Examines the contextual effects of social persuasion (represented by self, client, peer and supervis...
Purpose - Applicants often use impression management (IM) in employment interviews, and such tactics...
The study investigated the role of self-efficacy (general and task-specific) and justice perceptions...
In personnel selection procedures candidates usually try to make the “right” impression and act in l...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72121/1/j.1559-1816.2008.00369.x.pd