Add to ORKGLaw professors love puzzles. Give us a legal doctrine that does not make sense, or appears counterintuitive, or does not appear to comport with some methodological assumption, and we can spend months (if not years) plumbing its depths and producing reams of paper in exploring its contours. The good news today is that my exegesis shall be limited to the length of this lecture. Let me first set out the character of the puzzle and see if I cannot solve it in the time allotted
When lawyers think of civil procedure they almost invariably think of the rules of civil procedure a...
Following the suggestion of our Chairman, we have apparently agreed to assume that under the theme o...
In this Essay, I wish to build on Professor Waldron\u27s thoughtful analysis by saying something mor...
Law professors love puzzles. Give us a legal doctrine that does not make sense, or appears counterin...
It is an honor and privilege to contribute to this Issue of the Emory Law Journal remembering my lon...
Law has been a borrower but not a supplier. Law schools, in effect, have been located on one-way str...
Two of David Bederman\u27s recent works focus on the role and development of custom in international...
After considering the side road of critical legal studies, I shall try to indicate the major signpos...
Others in this Issue have noted David Bederman\u27s unsurpassed intellect as a scholar in admiralty ...
This dissertation is about the relationship between legal consistency and the rule of law. Chapter ...
Professor David J. Bederman\u27s seminal work, Custom as a Source of Law, seeks to answer several fo...
This period is marked by rather more strenuous efforts than have been made before in this country, t...
David Jeremy Bederman was intellectually fearless. His boundless intellect, however, was distinguish...
This paper contends that even as jurists invoke the official canonic version of the legal text, it i...
New York University Professor Jeremy Waldron visits Georgia Law as the 103rd Sibley Lecturer
When lawyers think of civil procedure they almost invariably think of the rules of civil procedure a...
Following the suggestion of our Chairman, we have apparently agreed to assume that under the theme o...
In this Essay, I wish to build on Professor Waldron\u27s thoughtful analysis by saying something mor...
Law professors love puzzles. Give us a legal doctrine that does not make sense, or appears counterin...
It is an honor and privilege to contribute to this Issue of the Emory Law Journal remembering my lon...
Law has been a borrower but not a supplier. Law schools, in effect, have been located on one-way str...
Two of David Bederman\u27s recent works focus on the role and development of custom in international...
After considering the side road of critical legal studies, I shall try to indicate the major signpos...
Others in this Issue have noted David Bederman\u27s unsurpassed intellect as a scholar in admiralty ...
This dissertation is about the relationship between legal consistency and the rule of law. Chapter ...
Professor David J. Bederman\u27s seminal work, Custom as a Source of Law, seeks to answer several fo...
This period is marked by rather more strenuous efforts than have been made before in this country, t...
David Jeremy Bederman was intellectually fearless. His boundless intellect, however, was distinguish...
This paper contends that even as jurists invoke the official canonic version of the legal text, it i...
New York University Professor Jeremy Waldron visits Georgia Law as the 103rd Sibley Lecturer
When lawyers think of civil procedure they almost invariably think of the rules of civil procedure a...
Following the suggestion of our Chairman, we have apparently agreed to assume that under the theme o...
In this Essay, I wish to build on Professor Waldron\u27s thoughtful analysis by saying something mor...