Woodruff concludes that ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) are sentient and that the pallium contributes to sentience in these fishes. He gives a detailed description of the pallium; however, he assumes that similar structures in fishes and tetrapods support similar behaviors, capabilities, and functions. I reject the premise that similarities in structure imply similarities in function. The fact that a selected species of fish may exhibit behaviors, reactions, and/or anatomy suggestive of sentience does not necessarily generalize to all teleosts
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...
Woodruff (2017) analyzes structural homologies and functional equivalences between the brains of mam...
Woodruff (2017) claims to have identified the neural correlates of phenomenal consciousness (“p-cons...
Woodruff concludes that ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) are sentient and that the pallium contrib...
In my target article, I argued that the brains of ray-finned fishes of the teleost subclass (Actinop...
Woodruff (2017) argues that teleosts’ more sophisticated behaviors make sense only if they are senti...
Ray-finned fish are often excluded from the group of non-human animals considered to have phenomenal...
Evolutionarily conserved features have been demonstrated at many levels of biological organization a...
Woodruff’s case for fish sentience is intriguing. Though far from ready for final acceptance, it is ...
Contrary to Woodruff’s suggestion, investigations into possible reasoning capacities of cichlid figh...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Balcombe’s book is filled with information on the biology, behavior, and life history of fishes. I d...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...
Woodruff (2017) analyzes structural homologies and functional equivalences between the brains of mam...
Woodruff (2017) claims to have identified the neural correlates of phenomenal consciousness (“p-cons...
Woodruff concludes that ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) are sentient and that the pallium contrib...
In my target article, I argued that the brains of ray-finned fishes of the teleost subclass (Actinop...
Woodruff (2017) argues that teleosts’ more sophisticated behaviors make sense only if they are senti...
Ray-finned fish are often excluded from the group of non-human animals considered to have phenomenal...
Evolutionarily conserved features have been demonstrated at many levels of biological organization a...
Woodruff’s case for fish sentience is intriguing. Though far from ready for final acceptance, it is ...
Contrary to Woodruff’s suggestion, investigations into possible reasoning capacities of cichlid figh...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
In this paper I argue that Velmens’ reflexive model of perceptual consciousness is useful for unders...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Balcombe’s book is filled with information on the biology, behavior, and life history of fishes. I d...
Woodruff makes two arguments to support his claim that ray-finned fish are conscious: (1) Fish neuro...
Woodruff’s target article on teleost consciousness is a well-organized logical argument for consider...
Woodruff (2017) analyzes structural homologies and functional equivalences between the brains of mam...
Woodruff (2017) claims to have identified the neural correlates of phenomenal consciousness (“p-cons...