Analytic philosophers have, since the pioneering work of B.K. Matilal, emphasized the contributions of Nyāya philosophers to what contemporary philosophy considers epistemology. More recently, scholarly work demonstrates the relevance of their ideas to argumentation theory, an interdisciplinary area of study drawing on epistemology as well as logic, rhetoric, and linguistics. This paper shows how early Nyāya theorizing about argumentation, from Vātsyāyana to Jayanta Bhaṭṭa, can fruitfully be juxtaposed with the pragma-dialectic approach to argumentation pioneered by Frans van Eemeren. I illustrate the implications of this analysis with a case study from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa’s satirical play, Much Ado about Religion (Āgamaḍambara)
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
Analytic philosophers have, since the pioneering work of B.K. Matilal, emphasized the contributions ...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
U raspravi između pragmadijalektike i epistemološkoga pristupa argumentaciji ovdje zastupam standard...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
In this essay, I argue that the pragma-dialectical approach to the analysis of argumentative discour...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
This paper addresses the possibility of a cognitive account of argumentation, by focusing on a tenta...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
Analytic philosophers have, since the pioneering work of B.K. Matilal, emphasized the contributions ...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
U raspravi između pragmadijalektike i epistemološkoga pristupa argumentaciji ovdje zastupam standard...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
In this essay, I argue that the pragma-dialectical approach to the analysis of argumentative discour...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
This paper addresses the possibility of a cognitive account of argumentation, by focusing on a tenta...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...