In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research project “Linguistic indicators of argumentative moves.” Starting from the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion, they design dialectical profiles for capturing the moves that may or must be made at a particular stage or sub-stage of such a discussion. They explain how these dialectical profiles can be methodically exploited for systematically identifying the verbal expressions that can be indicative of any of these moves in argumentative practice
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
In this paper a dialogue game for critical discussion is developed. The dialogue game is a formalisa...
Abstract: The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to ...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Linguistic descriptions of (markers of) textual relations are not always immediately relevant for pr...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
This article discusses the pragma-dialectical approach developed in the Netherlands by van Eemeren a...
Computer tools are increasingly used to support the analysis of argumentative texts. Generic support...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
In this paper a dialogue game for critical discussion is developed. The dialogue game is a formalisa...
Abstract: The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to ...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
This paper discusses the ways in which argumentative discourse prototypically manifests itself. As a...
Van Eemeren and Houtlosser concentrate on the tension inherent in argumentative discourse between th...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Linguistic descriptions of (markers of) textual relations are not always immediately relevant for pr...
The paper critically investigates the pragma-dialectics of van Eemeren and Grootendorst, particularl...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
This article discusses the pragma-dialectical approach developed in the Netherlands by van Eemeren a...
Computer tools are increasingly used to support the analysis of argumentative texts. Generic support...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
In this paper a dialogue game for critical discussion is developed. The dialogue game is a formalisa...
Abstract: The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to ...