In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research project ‘Linguistic indicators of argumentative moves’. Starting from the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion, they design dialectical profiles for capturing the moves that may or must be made at a particular stage or sub-stage of such a discussion. They explain how these dialectical profiles can be methodically exploited for systematically identifying the verbal expressions that can be indicative of any of these moves in argumentative practice
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
The notions of types of dialogue and dialectical relevance are central themes in Walton’s work and t...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
Abstract: The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to ...
The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to argumentat...
In this paper, I explore the potential of systematically studying the linguistic surface of discours...
The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory assumes that people engaged in argumentative di...
Abstract Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
Argumentation in interaction: The sequential structure of accounts in television debates Abstract Th...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
Over the past twenty years, the use of computational methods in the study of argumentation has been ...
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
The notions of types of dialogue and dialectical relevance are central themes in Walton’s work and t...
In this paper the authors give a brief overview of the theoretical background of their research proj...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
Abstract: The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to ...
The pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion takes a normative approach to argumentat...
In this paper, I explore the potential of systematically studying the linguistic surface of discours...
The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory assumes that people engaged in argumentative di...
Abstract Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
Argumentation in interaction: The sequential structure of accounts in television debates Abstract Th...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
Over the past twenty years, the use of computational methods in the study of argumentation has been ...
In this chapter we explain that the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation involves at the sam...
Theoretical and procedural diverseness is a feature characterising the study of argumentation. The ...
The notions of types of dialogue and dialectical relevance are central themes in Walton’s work and t...