In a game between two exporting countries, both countries may be better off if they both delegate to policymakers who maximise tax revenue rather than welfare. However, both countries delegating to policymakers who maximise revenue is not necessarily a Nash equilibrium. The game may be a prisoner’s dilemma where both countries are better off delegating to policymakers who maximise revenue, but both will delegate to policymakers who maximise welfare in the Nash equilibrium. This result is obtained in the Bertrand duopoly model of Eaton and Grossman (1986) and the perfectly competitive model of Panagariya and Schiff (1995)
This paper examines strategic subsidy/tax policy in a third-country market model with a monopoly ca...
When considering such economic phenomenon as an export, the producers of the exported goods, the pa...
This paper examines optimal policy towards a home exporting firm which competes on price with a fore...
In a game between two exporting countries, both countries may be better off if they both delegate to...
In a game between two exporting countries, both countries may be better off if they both delegate to...
In the Eaton and Grossman (1986) Bertrand duopoly model of strategic export taxes, both countries ma...
This article analyses export taxes in a Bertrand duopoly with product differentiation, where a home ...
This article analyses export taxes in a Bertrand duopoly with product differentiation, where a home ...
In the Eaton and Grossman (1986) model of export taxes under Bertrand duopoly, it is shown that welf...
In the Eaton and Grossman (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (1986), pp. 383–406) model of export ...
Welfare with the maximum‐revenue tariff is compared to free‐trade welfare under Cournot duopoly with...
This paper analyses whether a welfare maximizing government should tax or subsidize the home firms ...
We examine the welfare and other consequences of tax policy in a third market export model where duo...
In a strategic trade policy, it is assumed, in this paper, that a government changes disbursement or...
This paper examines optimal policy towards a home exporting firm which competes on price with a fore...
This paper examines strategic subsidy/tax policy in a third-country market model with a monopoly ca...
When considering such economic phenomenon as an export, the producers of the exported goods, the pa...
This paper examines optimal policy towards a home exporting firm which competes on price with a fore...
In a game between two exporting countries, both countries may be better off if they both delegate to...
In a game between two exporting countries, both countries may be better off if they both delegate to...
In the Eaton and Grossman (1986) Bertrand duopoly model of strategic export taxes, both countries ma...
This article analyses export taxes in a Bertrand duopoly with product differentiation, where a home ...
This article analyses export taxes in a Bertrand duopoly with product differentiation, where a home ...
In the Eaton and Grossman (1986) model of export taxes under Bertrand duopoly, it is shown that welf...
In the Eaton and Grossman (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (1986), pp. 383–406) model of export ...
Welfare with the maximum‐revenue tariff is compared to free‐trade welfare under Cournot duopoly with...
This paper analyses whether a welfare maximizing government should tax or subsidize the home firms ...
We examine the welfare and other consequences of tax policy in a third market export model where duo...
In a strategic trade policy, it is assumed, in this paper, that a government changes disbursement or...
This paper examines optimal policy towards a home exporting firm which competes on price with a fore...
This paper examines strategic subsidy/tax policy in a third-country market model with a monopoly ca...
When considering such economic phenomenon as an export, the producers of the exported goods, the pa...
This paper examines optimal policy towards a home exporting firm which competes on price with a fore...