Add to ORKGThe Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water permit to exhaust all available administrative remedies before seeking judicial review, even if the State Engineer is not authorized to provide the particular remedy that the party seeks. If the State Engineer is authorized by NRS § 533.395 to provide a party with a remedy, then the doctrine of futility does not apply to excuse the NRS § 533.394(4) exhaustion requirement. Therefore, the party must first show that the administrative process would afford him or her “no relief at all” before seeking judicial review without first exhausting all administrative remedies
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
The Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively ...
In an en banc appeal from a district court order, the Court affirmed the district court’s order gran...
The Court determined that due process requires junior water rights holders be given notice and an op...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided novel issues in two cas...
There must be clear and convincing, substantial evidence that a real property owner intentionally ab...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
Power company was not entitled to peremptory writ to prevent superior court from trying state\u27s a...
This case addressed the scarcity of water in the Diamond Valley Hydrologic Basin located in Eureka C...
The Virginia State Water Control Board certified the issuance of permits for the construction of a n...
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
The Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively ...
In an en banc appeal from a district court order, the Court affirmed the district court’s order gran...
The Court determined that due process requires junior water rights holders be given notice and an op...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided novel issues in two cas...
There must be clear and convincing, substantial evidence that a real property owner intentionally ab...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
Power company was not entitled to peremptory writ to prevent superior court from trying state\u27s a...
This case addressed the scarcity of water in the Diamond Valley Hydrologic Basin located in Eureka C...
The Virginia State Water Control Board certified the issuance of permits for the construction of a n...
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...