Add to ORKGPower company was not entitled to peremptory writ to prevent superior court from trying state\u27s action against it when Federal Power Act left states with traditional subject matter jurisdiction, and action merely sought injunction for nuisance
When city violated injunction which required it to contribute to the costs of new sewage facilities,...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania\u27s connectio...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Power company was not entitled to peremptory writ to prevent superior court from trying state\u27s a...
Trial court properly declared validity of existence of county water agency and member units, but imp...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
Defendant\u27s license for a patent was revoked, an order to destroy generators was upheld to preven...
A writ of prohibition restraining eminent domain proceedings was proper where the landowners had no ...
Document: 88th Congress, 1st Session, Senate, Document No. 20, Determination of the Rights of the St...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
A motion to quash a subpoena should have been granted where the underlying action was not pending in...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
By accepting a franchise right in public streets, a utility was subject to an implied obligation to ...
A state held water in trust for the benefit of the water users in an irrigation district, and was th...
Alternative writ of prohibition was discharged and a peremptory writ denied because there was no evi...
When city violated injunction which required it to contribute to the costs of new sewage facilities,...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania\u27s connectio...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...
Power company was not entitled to peremptory writ to prevent superior court from trying state\u27s a...
Trial court properly declared validity of existence of county water agency and member units, but imp...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
Defendant\u27s license for a patent was revoked, an order to destroy generators was upheld to preven...
A writ of prohibition restraining eminent domain proceedings was proper where the landowners had no ...
Document: 88th Congress, 1st Session, Senate, Document No. 20, Determination of the Rights of the St...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
A motion to quash a subpoena should have been granted where the underlying action was not pending in...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
By accepting a franchise right in public streets, a utility was subject to an implied obligation to ...
A state held water in trust for the benefit of the water users in an irrigation district, and was th...
Alternative writ of prohibition was discharged and a peremptory writ denied because there was no evi...
When city violated injunction which required it to contribute to the costs of new sewage facilities,...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania\u27s connectio...
In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay...