Add to ORKGThe Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively or constitute a retroactive application for two reasons: (1) the statute unambiguously applies to only approved applications; and (2) the applications at issue were approved almost five years after the statute took effect. Thus, the Court denied petitioner’s request for extraordinary writ attempting to bar the State Engineer from applying NRS § 533.3705(1) to the disputed water permit applications
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
There must be clear and convincing, substantial evidence that a real property owner intentionally ab...
The court found that the lower court had erroneously applied the incorrect statute in determining th...
The Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively ...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
In an en banc appeal from a district court order, the Court affirmed the district court’s order gran...
The Court determined that due process requires junior water rights holders be given notice and an op...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 361.395 does not provide the State Board with authority to order r...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Nevada Constitution, Article 19, § 2(3), prohibits the Legislature from amending or repealing a ...
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
There must be clear and convincing, substantial evidence that a real property owner intentionally ab...
The court found that the lower court had erroneously applied the incorrect statute in determining th...
The Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively ...
The Court held that NRS § 533.395 requires a party seeking relief from the cancellation of a water p...
In an en banc appeal from a district court order, the Court affirmed the district court’s order gran...
The Court determined that due process requires junior water rights holders be given notice and an op...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered a Petitioner home builder’s petition for writ relief and appeal ...
The court held that junior water rights holders are entitled to notice of and an opportunity to part...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 361.395 does not provide the State Board with authority to order r...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
In Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Nevada, Dept. of Wildlife, the Court of Appeals for the N...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the public trust doctrine permits reallocating rights al...
The Court had two holdings in this case. First, a final decision for purposes of judicial review mus...
The Nevada Constitution, Article 19, § 2(3), prohibits the Legislature from amending or repealing a ...
Appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying petition for jud...
There must be clear and convincing, substantial evidence that a real property owner intentionally ab...
The court found that the lower court had erroneously applied the incorrect statute in determining th...